An office-based intervention to maintain parent-adolescent teamwork in diabetes management. Impact on parent involvement, family conflict, and subsequent glycemic control.

Anderson, Barbara J.; Brackett, Julienne; Ho, Joyce; Laffel, Lori

doi:10.2337/diacare.22.5.713

Cited by 348 publications

(313 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

301

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As some research indicated (e.g. Anderson, Brackett, Ho, & Laffel, 1999;Conger & Donnellan, 2007), families' illness-related interactions significantly influence patient outcomes. Despite these limitations, our findings raise a number of new questions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The buffering effect of family functioning on the psychological consequences of headache

Mohammadi

zandieh

Dehghani

et al. 2016

Psychology, Health & Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The buffering effect of family functioning on the psychological consequences of headache

Mohammadi

zandieh

Dehghani

et al. 2016

Psychology, Health & Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A subsequent study of adolescents demonstrated that targeted improvements in conflict resolution and sharing of diabetes management responsibilities were maintained over 1 year (B. J. Anderson et al, 1999).…”

Section: The Need For User-friendly Easily Accessible and Cost-effementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Intervention that emphasizes the importance of adolescents and parents sharing responsibility for diabetes management appears to enhance continued parental involvement (B. J. Anderson, Brackett, Ho, & Laffel, 1999). Because habits in diabetes care established early tend to persist over time (Jacobson et al, 1990), several researchers have suggested that programs need to be implemented soon after diagnosis (B. J.…”

Section: Family Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diabetes and behavioral medicine: The second decade.

Gönder-Frederick¹,

Cox²,

Ritterband³

2002

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

166

144

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diabetes management depends almost entirely on behavioral self-regulation. Behavioral scientists have continued a collaboration with other health systems researchers to develop a holistic approach to this disease. The authors summarized the literature in 4 major areas: self-management of diabetes, psychosocial adjustment and quality of life, neuropsychological impact, and psychobehavioral intervention development. Progress made in each of these areas over the past decade is highlighted, as are important issues that have not yet received sufficient scientific attention. Emerging areas likely to become central in behavioral research, such as diabetes prevention, are introduced. The future of behavioral medicine in diabetes is also discussed, including topics such as the changing role of psychologists in diabetes care, the urgent need for more and better intervention research, the growing importance of incorporating a health system-public health perspective, and obstacles to the integration of psychobehavioral approaches into routine health care delivery.A profound event in diabetes management during the past decade was the release of the 1993 report of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT; DCCT Research Group, 1993), which radically altered both the goals and the philosophy of treatment of this disease. The DCCT was a controlled, prospective trial following more than 1,400 adults and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) over an average of 6.5 years. The results provided strong evidence that the use of intensive treatment regimens to maintain tighter glucose control can delay or prevent the development of at least some of the devastating long-term complications of diabetes, including retinopathy and nephropathy. Subsequent studies replicated these findings and demonstrated the benefits of maintaining tighter metabolic control for patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM; Ohkubo et al., 1995;Reichard, Nilsson, & Rosenqvist, 1993;Turner, Cull, & Holman, 1996).It is almost impossible to overestimate the impact of the DCCT on diabetes treatment and research. Seemingly overnight, large numbers of patients were expected to follow a demanding, intensive treatment regimen that previously had been recommended only for those who were most highly motivated and diligent in their diabetes self-management. Health care practitioners were also expected to know how to help patients achieve these lofty treatment goals. In addition to problems in implementing intensive treatment, questions arose concerning the effects of these regimens on quality of life (QOL) for patients. Intensive regimens also posed new dilemmas for health care practitioners and patients, not the least of which was the dramatic increase in risk for episodes of severe hypoglycemia when patients attempted to lower blood glucose (BG) levels. It quickly became clear that the greatest challenge to contemporary diabetes treatment was overcoming the many psychobehavioral and social-environmental barriers to optimal ...

show abstract

“…The next most critical goal is the adaptation of established parenting education curricula, such as the Systematic Training for Effecting Parenting (STEP) program 23 and Raising an Emotionally Intelligent Child, 24 which are based on the concepts of parenting styles discussed earlier and into which could be integrated proven pediatric behavioral diabetes family-based interventions, such as Coping Skills Training, 25 Behavioral Family Systems Therapy, 26 and Family Teamwork. 27 For diabetes health care providers, the child development literature instructs us to help parents build, if necessary, a new parenting style specific to diabetes management.…”

Section: From Research To Practice / Children and Families Living Witmentioning

confidence: 99%

Family Conflict and Diabetes Management in Youth: Clinical Lessons From Child Development and Diabetes Research

Anderson¹

2004

Diabetes Spectrum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Brief This articles focuses on family conflict and parenting behavior and their link to self-esteem, treatment adherence, and glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. From the diabetes literature and normal child development research, the concept of “authoritative parenting” seems especially applicable to the coping tasks facing parents and youth around the management of type 1 diabetes. Research on general family conflict, diabetes-specific family conflict, and child development are discussed with respect to the translation of findings to assist health care providers and parents.

show abstract

An office-based intervention to maintain parent-adolescent teamwork in diabetes management. Impact on parent involvement, family conflict, and subsequent glycemic control.

Cited by 348 publications

References 0 publications

The buffering effect of family functioning on the psychological consequences of headache

The buffering effect of family functioning on the psychological consequences of headache

Diabetes and behavioral medicine: The second decade.

Family Conflict and Diabetes Management in Youth: Clinical Lessons From Child Development and Diabetes Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About