2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An open and georeferenced dataset of forest structural attributes and microhabitats in central and southern Apennines (Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, based on highly repeatable and freely available RS data, they can be used at different spatial and temporal scales supporting the fieldwork limitations (Turner et al, 2003;Cerrejón et al, 2020). In the context of conservation priorities, the S2-derived harmonic metrics provided detailed and free information that might comprehensively complement ground data (Parisi et al, 2022b). While 10 m resolution may limit the capability to monitor small-scale relevant components of forest biodiversity, high-resolution images present some limitations.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, based on highly repeatable and freely available RS data, they can be used at different spatial and temporal scales supporting the fieldwork limitations (Turner et al, 2003;Cerrejón et al, 2020). In the context of conservation priorities, the S2-derived harmonic metrics provided detailed and free information that might comprehensively complement ground data (Parisi et al, 2022b). While 10 m resolution may limit the capability to monitor small-scale relevant components of forest biodiversity, high-resolution images present some limitations.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… This dataset represents a monitoring baseline for the main forest habitat type in the Basilicata Region. If integrated with other dataset, for example the one provided by Parisi et al [2] , where data for Basilicata Region are missing, the dataset can contribute to: 1) better understand the variability of the forest structural attributes in Central and Southern Italy and 2) produce the Favourable Reference Value for a list of indicators of forest ecosystems, based on real data, following the European Commission guidelines [3 , 4] . The release of this dataset promotes the collaboration among researchers, monitoring and management Institutions (Administrative Regions, Regional Agencies for the Protection of the Environment).…”
Section: Value Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If integrated with other dataset, for example the one provided by Parisi et al [2] , where data for Basilicata Region are missing, the dataset can contribute to: 1) better understand the variability of the forest structural attributes in Central and Southern Italy and 2) produce the Favourable Reference Value for a list of indicators of forest ecosystems, based on real data, following the European Commission guidelines [3 , 4] .…”
Section: Value Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the picture of light and shade depicted up to now, from a silvicultural point of view, the cultivation types pertaining to coppice (in all its cultural distinctions) and high forest each occupy just over 40% of the total area [158]. The remaining area is made up mostly of stands not subjected to any form of management, at most affected by sporadic interventions and therefore not attributable to canonical forms of forest management, mainly by areas abandoned by silvicultural practices due to geographical limitations (impervious land, rocky slopes or other topographical limitations) as well as areas interested in the (spontaneous) recolonization of abandoned crops [159][160][161].…”
Section: Forest Resources: Recent Dynamics In Italymentioning
confidence: 99%