2019 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ecace.2019.8679413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Optimization Approach to Improve Classification Performance in Cancer and Diabetes Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on several studies, we found that a commonly used dataset for health data mining was the Pima Indians Diabetes Dataset from the University of California, Irvine (UCI) Machine Learning Database [24][25][26][27][28][29]. The datasets consist of several medical predictor (independent) variables and one target (dependent) variable, Outcome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on several studies, we found that a commonly used dataset for health data mining was the Pima Indians Diabetes Dataset from the University of California, Irvine (UCI) Machine Learning Database [24][25][26][27][28][29]. The datasets consist of several medical predictor (independent) variables and one target (dependent) variable, Outcome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to check the performance of the upgraded network has been processedt the experimental dataset of [23,24], representing a good dataset for testing LSTM neural network. The experimental dataset [24] has been adopted in the literature for different data mining testing [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Specifically in reference [25], the K-means algorithm has been applied for predicting diabetes, in reference [26] some authors applied synthetic data in order to balance a machine learning dataset model, while references [27][28][29] have analyzed different machine learning algorithms for diabetes prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SVM classifier shows 75.65% accuracy. Al Helal, et al (2019) developed three categorization models which are the KNN, Naïve Bayes, and RF then their final accuracy was according to 66.19%, 72.66%, 73.72%. They were used in the Weka tool.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the SVM model was 75.65%. Al Helal, Mustakim, et al [10] constructed three classification models are the KNN, Naïve Bayes, and RF then their final accuracy was according to 66.19%, 72.66%, 73.72%. They were used in the Weka tool.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%