2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ordinal ranking criterion for the subjective evaluation of alternatives and exchange reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been recognized that differences in the experience and learning capacity of the DMs condition the evaluations provided for the alternatives (Hertwig et al, 2004). In this regard, Tavana et al (2015b) introduced a composite index that ranked the alternatives when the expected utility of the DM was determined by the potential perception differential arising between him and the raters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been recognized that differences in the experience and learning capacity of the DMs condition the evaluations provided for the alternatives (Hertwig et al, 2004). In this regard, Tavana et al (2015b) introduced a composite index that ranked the alternatives when the expected utility of the DM was determined by the potential perception differential arising between him and the raters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%