2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An original methodology for the analysis and interpretation of word-count based methods: Multiple factor analysis for contingency tables complemented by consensual words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis showed that two factors accounted for 24% of the variability of the data. Similar explained variance results were found in sensory analysis with nontrained and trained panellists (Veramendi et al, 2013;Kostov et al, 2014). This low proportion is expected considering the complexity in the odour sample profile, besides when CA is used to analyse a sorting task, it could underestimate the proportion of explained variance (Veramendi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Aroma Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This analysis showed that two factors accounted for 24% of the variability of the data. Similar explained variance results were found in sensory analysis with nontrained and trained panellists (Veramendi et al, 2013;Kostov et al, 2014). This low proportion is expected considering the complexity in the odour sample profile, besides when CA is used to analyse a sorting task, it could underestimate the proportion of explained variance (Veramendi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Aroma Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…A CA was performed to determine the relationships among the different honey production regions and the attributes of the samples (Fig. Similar explained variance results were found in sensory analysis with nontrained and trained panellists (Veramendi et al, 2013;Kostov et al, 2014). This analysis showed that two factors accounted for 24% of the variability of the data.…”
Section: Aroma Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In each session, consensual terms were identified using the methodology proposed by Kostov et al . (). Random subsets were obtained using a bootstrap methodology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%