2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview on recent profile monitoring papers (2008–2018) based on conceptual classification scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 186 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In statistical process monitoring (SPM), there have been a number of literature reviews that have shed some light on the current state of a particular topic and in doing so, made way for many publications thereafter; see, for instance, Refs. 1–5. Thus, the tradition emphasized by the latter articles is continued with the generally weighted moving average (GWMA) monitoring schemes in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In statistical process monitoring (SPM), there have been a number of literature reviews that have shed some light on the current state of a particular topic and in doing so, made way for many publications thereafter; see, for instance, Refs. 1–5. Thus, the tradition emphasized by the latter articles is continued with the generally weighted moving average (GWMA) monitoring schemes in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They used different monitoring statistics (i.e., transformations of the count data or DR or likelihood ratios) for the EWMA and CUSUM control charts, and showed that the performance of the different statistics is also similar. Maleki et al (2018) provided an overview of the profile monitoring methods since 2008 up to 2018. These papers were also analyzed under different directions for future recommendations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a functional relationship can be identified between the quality characteristic Z and one or more explanatory variables, then a profile can be defined. Profile monitoring has received a lot of attention in SPM literature: Since the early work of Kang and Albin about simple linear profiles, which are still widely investigated due to their easiness of implementation, see DeMagalhaes and Von Doellinger, Dawod et al, and Mahmood et al, the investigation has been extended to many other functional relationships and nonparametric techniques: Comprehensive reviews can be found in Woodall et al and Maleki and in the book of Noorossana et al Given the growing interest on geometric profile monitoring, see Colosimo et al, which today is becoming more and more precise thanks to the continuous developments in the measurement technologies, in this paper, we focus our attention on SPM of extreme values for geometric profiles. Product quality can be represented by geometric 1D or 2D profiles: In the latter case, we speak about surface monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%