2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11910-008-0044-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An update on the pathophysiology and genetics of restless legs syndrome

Abstract: This update on restless legs syndrome (RLS) focuses on its pathophysiology, genetics, health impact, and treatment. Although symptoms are exquisitely responsive to dopaminergics, clear delineation of dopaminergic pathology has not emerged. Rather, heuristic models of alterations in spinal sensorimotor circuits and central nervous system iron deficiency are gaining more attention. Genome-wide association studies have recently identified polymorphisms in three genes with no obvious relationship to dopamine that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,4 Restless legs syndrome is a clinical diagnosis that is determined by applying the four diagnostic questions of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group, 2,3 either by a face-to-face interview or a telephone interview. 5 The etiology of RLS is unclear; however, disturbances of dopamine and iron metabolism and genetic predisposition have been implicated, 6,7 and RLS has been associated with peripheral neuropathy, diabetes, iron defi ciency, smoking, spinal cord injuries, pregnancy, Parkinson disease, older age, end-stage renal disease, and the use of some antidepressants. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The prevalence of RLS reported in international epidemiological studies has varied widely from as low as 0.4% to 15% among the general population; however, the most often quoted range is from 5% to 15%.…”
Section: S C I E N T I F I C I N V E S T I G a T I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,4 Restless legs syndrome is a clinical diagnosis that is determined by applying the four diagnostic questions of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group, 2,3 either by a face-to-face interview or a telephone interview. 5 The etiology of RLS is unclear; however, disturbances of dopamine and iron metabolism and genetic predisposition have been implicated, 6,7 and RLS has been associated with peripheral neuropathy, diabetes, iron defi ciency, smoking, spinal cord injuries, pregnancy, Parkinson disease, older age, end-stage renal disease, and the use of some antidepressants. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The prevalence of RLS reported in international epidemiological studies has varied widely from as low as 0.4% to 15% among the general population; however, the most often quoted range is from 5% to 15%.…”
Section: S C I E N T I F I C I N V E S T I G a T I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] While defects in dopamine function and iron metabolism have long been considered key factors in RLS pathogenesis, [12][13][14][15] evidence remains inconclusive. 9,[16][17][18] An emerging body of research suggests that autonomic and metabolic dysfunction may also play an important role. 2,19 Recent communitybased studies suggest that RLS may also be linked, in a bidirectional manner, to cardiovascular disease (CVD), stroke, and key components of the metabolic syndrome, 2,9,10,20 associations that may be mediated in part by the adverse effects of RLS on sleep and mood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of RLS is purely clinical, based on history alone, and relies on the fulfillment of these four diagnostic criteria. Despite advances in our knowledge of RLS (Trotti et al, 2008), a number of critical questions remain unknown concerning its overall prevalence, its psychological impact, and its treatment. RLS patients have a higher incidence of psychological discomfort, depression, anxiety, and are more frequently under hypnotic or antidepressant treatment than non-RLS subjects (Gorman et al, 1965;Phillips et al, 2000;Rothdach et al, 2000;Saletu et al, 2002;Sevim et al, 2004;Celle et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%