Análise do impacto dos projetos de interação entre a UFRGS e a PETROBRAS

Matei, Ana Paula; Caten, Carla Schwengber ten; Zouain, Ricardo Norberto Ayup; Sant’Anna, Ângelo Márcio Oliveira

doi:10.1590/0104-530x25298-14

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The next paragraphs address the findings of each of these areas. The collaboration between universities and companies as a means to boost OI is the object of research of most of the studies identified (Alves & Pimenta-Bueno, 2014;Castro et al, 2014;Carrijo & Botelho, 2013;Closs & Ferreira, 2012;Fernandes et al, 2016;Gielfi et al, 2017;Matei et al, 2015;Oliveira & Balestrin, 2015;Schaeffer et al, 2015;Silva et al, 2013b;Stal & Fujino, 2016). Closs & Ferreira (2012) point out that university-company collaboration tends to be positive for companies because, in addition to reducing innovation costs, it also allows greater access to qualified people and university structures, especially laboratories.…”

Section: Presentation Of Results and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, in this area of collaboration university -company, Petrobras stands out as the company which leads university-company research (Alves & Pimenta-Bueno, 2014;Gielfi et al, 2017;Matei et al, 2015). In addition to its importance to Brazil, as reported by Gielfi et al (2017), this emphasis occurs mainly because Petrobras has an extensive network of scientific collaborations dispersed throughout the country.…”

Section: Presentation Of Results and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The concept of OI has been used in many different types of industries with different forms of production and markets, such as electronics, automotive, domestic utilities, and the food industry (Ades et al, 2011). The end user can be also a partner for innovation in a variety of ways, such as website interaction, co-development, customer service channels, and specific events such as best idea contests (Lorentz et al, 2016;MacCormack et al, 2013).…”

Section: Open Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The landscape of open innovation in Brazil: An analysis of the recent literature

Ferrari

Scaliza

Jugend

2019

Prod.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Systematic Review Creative Commons Attribution License 1. Introduction The last decades have challenged several firms to adopt new innovation models (Sikimic et al., 2016; Slater et al., 2014; Von Hippel, 1986). These challenges arise from companies in different parts of the world simultaneously searching for markets and new ways of organizing innovation; this creates opportunities to access new technologies, and novel supply possibilities and partnerships, not only with local companies, but also with firms in other countries. In this scenario, the Open Innovation (OI) concept as proposed by Chesbrough (2003) has been highlighted by practitioners and researchers (e.g., Laursen & Salter, 2006; Randhawa et al., 2016; Rubera et al., 2016) because of its potential to intensify the flow of internal and external knowledge in order to improve the innovation process. Due to recent changes in the business environment, reflected in the increasing speed of technological changes and shortened life cycle of products, it is difficult for companies to ensure their competitiveness through the unique and exclusive internal development of new technologies (D'Ambrosio et al., 2017). Therefore, many companies are developing more open ways to innovate what is also known as OI: a model in which companies more intensively use ideas and technologies developed inside and outside their borders in the innovation process (Chesbrough, 2012; Bogers et al., 2017). Furthermore, OI also tends to provide new sources of revenue for firms through actions such as inclusion in new markets and the prospects of spin-offs and trading licenses. These

show abstract

Section: Presentation Of Results and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Presentation Of Results and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Open Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The landscape of open innovation in Brazil: An analysis of the recent literature

Ferrari

Scaliza

Jugend

2019

Prod.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Estes dois atores têm função complementar no processo de desenvolvimento tecnológico e na inovação. Da mesma forma, contribuem mutuamente para o alcance dos objetivos de ambos, mesmo que distintos (MATEI et al, 2015).…”

Section: Interação Universidade E Empresa E Contratos De Transferênci...unclassified

O grau de intensidade da interação universidade e empresa no Brasil por meio de contratos de transferência tecnologia

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O presente artigo teve como objetivo identificar o grau de intensidade da interação universidade e empresa, por meio dos contratos de transferência de tecnologia (CTTs). Para isso, realizou-se um pesquisa qualitativa com oito especialistas da universidade e empresa. Após essa etapa foi aplicado um questionário com profissionais das duas instituições, sendo que foram analisadas 153 questionários válidos. As informações das duas pesquisas foram confrontadas, verificando aspectos convergentes e divergentes. Os resultados apontaram que 77% dos respondentes do survey realizam a interação universidade empresa por meio de contratos de transferência de tecnologia, porém quando considerado a frequência da interação, percebeu-se que a interação possui um grau de intensidade médio. Esse grau de interação se manifesta de maneira em cada região do País. A pesquisa identificou o grau de interação pelos diversos perfis dos respondentes em relação as empresas e universidades.

show abstract