1972
DOI: 10.2514/3.59053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and Correlation of Data on Pressure Fluctuations in Separated Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
48
1
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
10
48
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This maximum is located just upstream of the mean reattachment point location. This is coherent both with the present experimental measurements and the data collected from a numerous con¦gurations of separated §ows [11]. Nevertheless, noticeable discrepancies appear in the second part of the recirculation region where the levels are overestimated by a factor 2 at the end of the afterbody.…”
Section: Pressure Fluctuations Levelssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This maximum is located just upstream of the mean reattachment point location. This is coherent both with the present experimental measurements and the data collected from a numerous con¦gurations of separated §ows [11]. Nevertheless, noticeable discrepancies appear in the second part of the recirculation region where the levels are overestimated by a factor 2 at the end of the afterbody.…”
Section: Pressure Fluctuations Levelssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…zone. Gurbacki points out that the location of the peak RMS C p is consistent with RMS pressures observed in backward facing step flows [39][40][41][42] and flows over blunt flat plates. 43,44 Instabilities in the shear layer eventually generate spanwise vortices, which amalgamate to form larger vortical structures.…”
Section: Horn-ice Flowfieldsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The predicted amplitude of pressure fluctuations in the present case is higher than the peak r.m.s. fluctuation in Cp of 0.06 previously measured near the reattachment downstream of a backward facing step [52]. Certainly, a part of the difference in Cp' magnitudes may be related to the inherent differences between the respective flow configurations and the larger than expected spanwise coherence in the computational simulations (see subsection 3. below); however, it will be very useful to have future measurements of slat pressure fluctuations near the reattachment region to help resolve this important issue.…”
Section: Pressure Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 99%