2019
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2019.906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of a civil aircraft wing transonic shock buffet experiment

Abstract: The physical mechanism governing the onset of transonic shock buffet on swept wings remains elusive, with no unequivocal description forthcoming despite over half a century of research. This paper elucidates the fundamental flow physics on a civil aircraft wing using an extensive experimental database from a transonic wind tunnel facility. The analysis covers a wide range of flow conditions at a Reynolds number of around 3.6 × 10 6 . Data at pre-buffet conditions and beyond onset are assessed for Mach numbers … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the studies were carried out on half-wing body aircraft configuration. A broadband frequency content with a dominant frequency higher than the one of 2-D buffet was found experimentally (Roos 1985;Dandois 2016;Koike et al 2016;Paladini et al 2019b;Masini, Timme & Peace 2020). On such configurations, the convection of flow perturbations towards the wing tip was observed and buffet cells can be seen in the pressure-sensitive paint measurements of Sugioka et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the studies were carried out on half-wing body aircraft configuration. A broadband frequency content with a dominant frequency higher than the one of 2-D buffet was found experimentally (Roos 1985;Dandois 2016;Koike et al 2016;Paladini et al 2019b;Masini, Timme & Peace 2020). On such configurations, the convection of flow perturbations towards the wing tip was observed and buffet cells can be seen in the pressure-sensitive paint measurements of Sugioka et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…2016; Paladini et al. 2019 b ; Masini, Timme & Peace 2020). On such configurations, the convection of flow perturbations towards the wing tip was observed and buffet cells can be seen in the pressure-sensitive paint measurements of Sugioka et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A spanwise outboard propagation of buffet cells (a term coined by Iovnovich & Raveh (2015)), which is believed to constitute the instability, has been reported both in experimental and numerical studies (Lawson, Greenwell & Quinn 2016;Sartor & Timme 2017;Sugioka et al 2018). A spanwise inboard propagation, dominant along the shock front, has also been identified experimentally at lower frequencies (Dandois 2016;Masini et al 2017;Masini, Timme & Peace 2020). Timme & Thormann (2016) observed resonant flow due to forced wing vibration in the same lower frequency range, in addition to distinct flow responses around typical shock-buffet frequencies on wings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Aerodynamic measurements and flow visualization using PSP have been conducted for various measurement targets in various conditions [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Instantaneous measurements in particular have been actively conducted and developed in recent years [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%