2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2917757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Artifacts on Chipless RFID Backscatter Tag Signals for Real World Implementation

Abstract: Chipless radio-frequency identification (RFID) has been studied as an alternative technique to conventional chipped RFID. However, chipless RFID tag backscatter signals are affected by motion and especially when they are attached to different objects. In this paper, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the backscattered chipless tag signal in two different stages. At the first stage, we performed an analysis of the backscattered signal in the nonanechoic environment when the frequency-coded tags were movin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 and Fig. 8 respectively, where we choose amplitude response of the backscatter signal for further analysis due to its challenging behaviour in detecting tag IDs as discussed in [6]. Fig.…”
Section: A Attack Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 and Fig. 8 respectively, where we choose amplitude response of the backscatter signal for further analysis due to its challenging behaviour in detecting tag IDs as discussed in [6]. Fig.…”
Section: A Attack Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches to chipless tag localization use time-resolved techniques [137][138][139] typical of widespread chipped RFID technologies, such as round-trip time of flight [140], or phase acquisition [141,142]. Frequency coded approaches are also present [143][144][145], even though detecting and localizing the chipless tags could be challenging because the indoor signal propagation environments are complex and the backscattered signal from the tag is weak [146][147][148]. To overcome these limitations, suitable radar techniques have been developed [119,149].…”
Section: Position Displacement and Touch Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…localizing the chipless tags could be challenging because the indoor signal propagation environments are complex and the backscattered signal from the tag is weak [146][147][148]. To overcome these limitations, suitable radar techniques have been developed [119,149].…”
Section: Position Displacement and Touch Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chipless tags are also attached to the plastic box filled in a controlled way with tape rolls. On the other hand, the mother wavelet is applied to extract the ID of tag mounted on various objects [30], where the tag motion at different stepped positions is also considered. It is important to note that all these works [25]- [30] are based on the calibrated signals (i.e., with background normalization).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%