2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2011.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of error in soot characterization using scattering-based techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The balance between accuracy and computational expense is the main concern for calculation of the optical properties of nanoparticle systems. While RDG-FA is one of the fastest approaches available, Ma [10] compared angular scattering properties of soot aggregates comprised of 128 particles each having a diameter of 30 nm with m = 1.77 + 0.63i, and observed a relative error up to 10% in both S 11 and S 12 profiles calculated by RDG-FA and T-matrix methods. In another study, Zhao and Ma [11] studied the scattering cross section and some elements of Mueller matrix (S 11 , S 12 and S 33 ) of soot aggregates, and observed a relative error up to 15% in scattering cross section and up to 50% in the Mueller matrix elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The balance between accuracy and computational expense is the main concern for calculation of the optical properties of nanoparticle systems. While RDG-FA is one of the fastest approaches available, Ma [10] compared angular scattering properties of soot aggregates comprised of 128 particles each having a diameter of 30 nm with m = 1.77 + 0.63i, and observed a relative error up to 10% in both S 11 and S 12 profiles calculated by RDG-FA and T-matrix methods. In another study, Zhao and Ma [11] studied the scattering cross section and some elements of Mueller matrix (S 11 , S 12 and S 33 ) of soot aggregates, and observed a relative error up to 15% in scattering cross section and up to 50% in the Mueller matrix elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%