Analysis of EZproxy server logs to visualise research activity in Curtin’s online library

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop data visualisation proof of concept prototypes that will enable the Curtin University Library team to explore its users’ information-seeking behaviour and collection use online by analysing the library’s EZproxy logs. Design/methodology/approach Curtin Library’s EZproxy log file data from 2013 to 2017 is used to develop the data visualisation prototypes using Unity3D software. Findings Two visualisation prototypes from the EZproxy data set are developed. The first, “Global Visualisation of Curtin Research Activity”, uses a geographical map of the world as a platform to show where each research request comes from, the time each is made and the file size of the request. The second prototype, “Database Usage Visualisation”, shows the use of the library’s various subscription databases by staff and students daily, over a month in April 2017. Research limitations/implications The paper has following limitations: working to a tight timeline of ten weeks; time taken to cleanse noise data; and requirements for storing and hosting the voluminous data sets. Practical implications The prototypes provide visual evidence of the use of Curtin Library’s digital resources at any time and from anywhere by its users, demonstrating the demand for the library’s online service offerings. These prototype evidence-based data visualisations empower the library to communicate in a compelling and interesting way how its services and subscriptions support Curtin University’s missions. Originality/value The paper provides innovative approaches to create immersive 3D data visualisation prototypes to make sense of complex EZproxy data sets.

Develop an Interactive Python Dashboard for Analyzing EZproxy Logs

“…As some articles reveal, EZproxy logs with enhanced data can be used to analyze the usage of eresources to answer questions like who the users are: students, graduate students, or faculty; whether the users are on campus or off campus; what kind of devices the users are using for the access; or how the users find the resources (Dennison and Sung, 2019;Joseph, et al, 2019;Kohler and Stoval, 2019;Yeager, 2017). However, "[I]t can often be difficult to analyze EZproxy data using the conventional tools available (Gonzales, 2018)."…”

Access, organize and communicate: the strategic use of browser plugins in libraries

“…Browser plugins, particularly those simplifying the process of searching and finding the pdf of a full-text article, have been summarized discretely (Ferguson, 2019; Hoy, 2019; Joseph et al , 2019; Heady, 2021). Focusing on academic search plugins, Hoy (2019) identified two types plugins- active and passive.…”

“…The use of proxy bookmarklet plugins in accessing resources off-campus and supporting online research is predominant among many libraries (Joseph et al , 2019). Once the library proxy bookmarklet is installed on the browser toolbar, it routes the user to the full text of an article upon login, availing the library’s off-campus proxy service, subject to the library having access to that article.…”