Analysis of flow cytometry data from ultrasound‐guided lymph node biopsies with two types of needles

Abstract

BackgroundIn this study, we combined two techniques, ultrasound‐guided needle biopsy and flow cytometry (FCM), to explore their value in patients with enlarged lymph nodes.MethodsWe compared the results of 198 needle biopsies on FCM and pathology. Forty‐two were done by (fine needle aspiration, FNA), and the remaining 156 with (core needle biopsy, CNB), in 36 of 156 patients, a FNA was performed in the same lymph node after completion of the CNB. Except for five types of pathological entities, the rest were differentiated only detected or undetected tumours as the outcome distinction.ResultsAmong the 198 needle biopsies, 13 were inadequate specimens, while the remaining 185 had pathological findings, including 47 benign and 138 neoplastic findings. Thirty‐six patients underwent puncture with both FNA and CNB, both needles produced identical results by FCM, but more cells were obtained by FNA. Among the pathologically positive results, there were 23 missed diagnoses in FCM, in contrast, evidence of tumours was observed in the FCM images of 15 needle biopsies that reported benign or findings that were inconsistent with pathology, and the final diagnosis was consistent with the FCM in 10 cases. FCM detected haematolymphoid tumours with a sensitivity of 87.8% and a specificity of 91.9%.ConclusionThe combination of FCM and ultrasound‐guided lymph node needle biopsy can quickly provide guidance for clinical decision‐making. We recommend that all lymph node needle biopsies be sent for FCM, the specimen can be obtained by the last puncture with FNA.