2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of formation pressure test results in the Mount Elbert methane hydrate reservoir through numerical simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to the Mallik 2002 MDT tests, the individual Mount Elbert tests were of longer duration, with the tests ranging from 6 to nearly 13 h to further enhance data interpretability. Acquisition of this open-hole, dual-packer MDT data confirm earlier results obtained at Mallik (Dallimore and Collett, 2005;Hancock et al, 2004) and indicate ability to technically recover gas from gas hydrates through depressurization (Pooladi- Darvish and Hong, 2011;Anderson et al, 2011a;Kurihara et al, 2011). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Formation Pressure Testing Program Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In comparison to the Mallik 2002 MDT tests, the individual Mount Elbert tests were of longer duration, with the tests ranging from 6 to nearly 13 h to further enhance data interpretability. Acquisition of this open-hole, dual-packer MDT data confirm earlier results obtained at Mallik (Dallimore and Collett, 2005;Hancock et al, 2004) and indicate ability to technically recover gas from gas hydrates through depressurization (Pooladi- Darvish and Hong, 2011;Anderson et al, 2011a;Kurihara et al, 2011). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Formation Pressure Testing Program Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…1-3 show the pressure, production, and temperature comparisons, respectively, between the actual and model results. Kurihara (2011) present other matches. The following observations can be made: 1.…”
Section: Match Of the Second And Third Shut-in Periodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Kurihara et al (2011) presents a history match of the results. This paper is complementary to the above, by assessing the degree of uncertainty associated with the history match, and its implications for the long-term predictions.…”
Section: Mdt Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measured residual water saturation after depressurization for this specimen is S rw ¼ 0.16. Relative permeability k rw dependence on S w during repressurization can be estimated (solid curve) with the Brooks and Corey (1964) model, where the best fit curve is nearly identical to the prediction using the parameters from Kurihara et al (2011). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)…”
Section: Water Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 87%