2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of hygienic critical control points in boar semen production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
94
1
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
94
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As these vats have several areas that are difficult to access for cleaning, the formation of biofilms inside the container could have taken place, allowing bacterial multiplication (SILVA et al, 2006). Indeed, Schulze et al (2015) verified that bacteria colonize the inner surface of dilution tanks lids during semen processing. In the presence of biofilms, conventional disinfection methods are not sufficient, requiring the use of higher disinfectant concentrations, which usually leave residues (SILVA et al, 2006) that can be toxic to spermatozoa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As these vats have several areas that are difficult to access for cleaning, the formation of biofilms inside the container could have taken place, allowing bacterial multiplication (SILVA et al, 2006). Indeed, Schulze et al (2015) verified that bacteria colonize the inner surface of dilution tanks lids during semen processing. In the presence of biofilms, conventional disinfection methods are not sufficient, requiring the use of higher disinfectant concentrations, which usually leave residues (SILVA et al, 2006) that can be toxic to spermatozoa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore, the degree of contamination of raw semen seems to have less of an effect on the quality of semen doses than situations in which the source of contamination comes from poor hygiene in the semen processing line. This aspect has been recently highlighted (SCHULZE et al, 2015) by the fact that in most cases, all of the samples from one stud were contaminated with identical bacteria, indicating contamination during semen processing. The production of semen doses with a high microbiological quality requires a strict care beyond the hygiene during semen collection, as raw semen with few CFU does not guarantee that semen doses will be free of contaminants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations