IEEE GLOBECOM 2007-2007 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference 2007
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2007.352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Interdomain Smart Routing and Traffic Engineering Interactions

Abstract: Multihoming Smart Routing plays a significant role in improving the performance of Internet access of IP Network Customers through dynamic path switching. On the other hand, Inter-domain Traffic Engineering becomes indispensable for IP Network Providers, in order for them to meet their traffic objectives. Unfortunately, this ability of both parties to choose their own routing policies does not necessary lead to the best routing in the Internet. A major challenge of the research on Traffic Engineering and Inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, this can be modeled as a dynamic optimization problem, and a promising line of work is to seek for: The fourth and last open issue in IRC is to analyze the feasibility of coordinating -up to some extent -the route control decisions between domains (see for example [37]), and particularly, the interactions between IRC and the usual TE actions carried out by ISPs. An initial work in this direction was recently proposed in [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, this can be modeled as a dynamic optimization problem, and a promising line of work is to seek for: The fourth and last open issue in IRC is to analyze the feasibility of coordinating -up to some extent -the route control decisions between domains (see for example [37]), and particularly, the interactions between IRC and the usual TE actions carried out by ISPs. An initial work in this direction was recently proposed in [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%