2017
DOI: 10.1177/0890334417706906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Media Coverage on Breastfeeding Policy in Washington State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nutrition advocates were vocal in their calls for government action and the government responsibility frame was most frequently used, which supports a growing body of evidence that shows when media reports on nutrition policies this frame is more likely to be used to demonstrate how government can implement change such as through the taxing of sugar or improving nutrition labelling. [37][38][39][40] The societal frame was not a dominant frame in this analysis. This frame was used to identify correlations between social determinants of health and poor nutrition and health outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nutrition advocates were vocal in their calls for government action and the government responsibility frame was most frequently used, which supports a growing body of evidence that shows when media reports on nutrition policies this frame is more likely to be used to demonstrate how government can implement change such as through the taxing of sugar or improving nutrition labelling. [37][38][39][40] The societal frame was not a dominant frame in this analysis. This frame was used to identify correlations between social determinants of health and poor nutrition and health outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…44 However, the dominant use of the government responsibility frame in this study supports emerging international evidence that when media reports on proposed nutrition polices, the government responsibility frame is more dominant and may be an indication that media reporting is changing. [37][38][39][40] The use of the nanny-state frame criticised government regulation for impinging on personal freedoms. There was little challenge to this hyperbole from nutrition advocates, which is consistent with findings from other studies which found health advocates did little to contest nanny-state rhetoric when used by opponents of regulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is little information on how media coverage on breastfeeding influences a country's breastfeeding enabling environment (Bridges, Howell, & Schimied, 2018;Brown & Peuchaud, 2008; DeMarchis, Ritter, Otten, & Johnson, 2018). This study addressed this gap by conducting a review to document the degree and content of media coverage related to breastfeeding in Mexico following the assessment of the country's breastfeeding enabling environment in 2016 (González de Cosío, Ferré, Mazariegos & Pérez-Escamilla, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although advocacy and communication can start at problem definition, the iterative sequence now formalizes presentation of arguments to capture buy-in and support, and to minimize and/or skillfully mitigate resistance. Core systematic methods encourage the acknowledgement of weaknesses and opposing arguments (Barry et al, 2019;DeMarchis et al, 2018;Fischer, 1995;Fischer & Gottweis, 2012McGinty et al, 2016), in order to legitimate the alternative choice (Boydstun et al, 2013;Coontz, 2015;Mulderrig, 2017;Nowlin, 2016;Zarefsky, 2008). Analysts can plan interaction with a number of venues, that is, legislative, judicial, or media channels (Buffardi et al, 2015;Huwyler et al, 2018;Langer & Brace, 2005),…”
Section: Use Of Core Systematic Methods At Each Stage Of Policy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%