2012
DOI: 10.1128/aem.06373-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Structure and Composition of Bacterial Core Communities in Mature Drinking Water Biofilms and Bulk Water of a Citywide Network in Germany

Abstract: ABSTRACTThe bacterial core communities of bulk water and corresponding biofilms of a more than 20-year-old drinking water network were compared using 16S rRNA single-strand confirmation polymorphism (SSCP) fingerprints based on extracted DNA and RNA. The structure and composition of the bacterial core community in the bulk water was highly similar (>70%) across the city of Braunschweig, Germany, whereas all biofilm samples contained a unique community with no overlapping phy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
125
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
19
125
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This study also observed seasonal variation as a key factor to drive the overall variation in the biofilm community (Figures 3a and b) and influence the dynamics of several core populations. Similar observations were reported in DWDS pipe section biofilms (Henne et al, 2012). We hypothesize that seasonal water temperature fluctuation is the likely reason (Supplementary Figure S1B); however, further Drinking water distribution system microbiota F Ling et al studies are needed for better elucidation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study also observed seasonal variation as a key factor to drive the overall variation in the biofilm community (Figures 3a and b) and influence the dynamics of several core populations. Similar observations were reported in DWDS pipe section biofilms (Henne et al, 2012). We hypothesize that seasonal water temperature fluctuation is the likely reason (Supplementary Figure S1B); however, further Drinking water distribution system microbiota F Ling et al studies are needed for better elucidation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Only a few studies have sampled the whole community of biofilms in fullscale systems. Diverse composition (Henne et al, 2012;Kelly et al, 2014) and temporal variation in biomass and dominant species have been observed (Kelly et al, 2014). However, these studies typically used pipeline sections as the source of biofilms, and because of the feasibility of acquiring multiple pipe sections, spatial replication can be limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viable cells in the water leaving the WTP were dominated by Gammapoteobacteria (Fig 3), particularly members of Xanthomonadales order (Table 1), while the enrichment of viable Alphaproteobacteria in homes with piped and cistern water (Fig 3) indicates that biofilms are present on the inner surfaces of pipes and cisterns in the water distribution system of this community (Mathieu et al, 2009;Henne et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five such sequences were discovered along with potential opportunistic pathogens in showerhead biofilms (17). A recent study of a more than 20-y-old drinking water network that compared bacterial core communities in bulk water and associated biofilms revealed that the biofilm samples contained a unique community with no overlapping phylotypes with the bulk water samples (45). TM6 represented 11% of the clones observed in these biofilms.…”
Section: Phylogenetic and Phylogenomic Analyses Of Candidate Phylum Tm6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S7), which suggests that this phylum has a cosmopolitan distribution, although typically found at low relative abundance. Its ecological distribution (derived from published and unpublished studies that have deposited related sequences in GenBank) includes domestic water sources (17,39,45), acidic cave biofilms, acid mine drainage biofilms (46), wastewater biofilms (47), soil, contaminated groundwater and subsurface sites (48,49), aquatic moss, hypersaline mats, peat bogs, and peat swamps (30,50). These and additional environments where TM6 was detected in 16S rRNA gene clone libraries, including a number of biofilm-related samples, are highlighted in SI Appendix, Table S1.…”
Section: Phylogenetic and Phylogenomic Analyses Of Candidate Phylum Tm6mentioning
confidence: 99%