2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the dynamics of soil infiltrability of agricultural soils from continuous rainfall-runoff measurements on small plots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Local measurements have demonstrated the influence of SSC on hydrodynamic properties and soil detachment (Cerdan et al, 2002a). Microscale investigations, such as plot studies, have shown how patterns of SSC have a very strong influence on soil hydraulic properties, particle detachment, infiltration patterns, connectivity of runoff, distribution of flow velocities, and therefore the initiation of rilling (Loch, 1994;Dimanche and Hoogmoed, 2002;Leonard et al, 2006). Very simple SSC indicators based on vegetation cover, crusting and surface roughness appear to be the best indicators to explain the variability of the rill erosion rate between small catchment areas (Auzet et al, 1993) and are efficient for runoff and rill erosion modelling whether at this scale (Ludwig et al, 1995;Cerdan et al, 2002bCerdan et al, , 2002c or at a regional scale (Le Bissonnais et al, 2002Bissonnais et al, , 2005.…”
Section: Soil Surface Characteristics and Overland Flow And Soil Erosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local measurements have demonstrated the influence of SSC on hydrodynamic properties and soil detachment (Cerdan et al, 2002a). Microscale investigations, such as plot studies, have shown how patterns of SSC have a very strong influence on soil hydraulic properties, particle detachment, infiltration patterns, connectivity of runoff, distribution of flow velocities, and therefore the initiation of rilling (Loch, 1994;Dimanche and Hoogmoed, 2002;Leonard et al, 2006). Very simple SSC indicators based on vegetation cover, crusting and surface roughness appear to be the best indicators to explain the variability of the rill erosion rate between small catchment areas (Auzet et al, 1993) and are efficient for runoff and rill erosion modelling whether at this scale (Ludwig et al, 1995;Cerdan et al, 2002bCerdan et al, , 2002c or at a regional scale (Le Bissonnais et al, 2002Bissonnais et al, , 2005.…”
Section: Soil Surface Characteristics and Overland Flow And Soil Erosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At very small scale (1 m 2 ), SSC spatial variability controls runoff connectivity. Based on Leonard et al (2006) study, we thought that mulched patches may constitute preferential infiltration areas. Authors work on runoff data of small plots (2 m 2 ) in conventional tillage context under natural rainfall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it protects soil against mechanical degradation by rain. This strongly reduces runoff generation which is admitted to become significant when crust cover exceeds 50% of the experimental plot; corresponding to a general connection between crusted patches (Leonard et al, 2006).…”
Section: Crust Cover Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real time flow rate and water stage estimates can be computed by deploying sensors in such flumes, whereas overland flow rate can be automatically recorded by using tipping buckets (Johnson et al, 1996;Fiener and Auerswald, 2005;Léonard et al, 2006;Laloy and Bielders, 2008;Ghahramani et al, 2011). Erosion and runoff experimental studies are also conducted through physical sampling of overland flow water in tapped containers after precipitation events (Mathys et al, 2005;Armand et al, 2009;Patin et al, 2012).…”
Section: Published By Copernicus Publications On Behalf Of the Europementioning
confidence: 99%