2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of tissue abnormality and breast density in mammographic images using a uniform local directional pattern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrasting with several other recently developed methods for quantifying breast density from mammography further highlights the uniqueness of our proposed method. It appears new works published still primarily take a 2D approach to either density- [51,52] or parenchymal pattern-based segmentations [33,37], though our method takes advantage of the third dimension. Other 3D approaches using mammography exist and also become more common, but are often proprietary [19,53] or may require in-image phantoms [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrasting with several other recently developed methods for quantifying breast density from mammography further highlights the uniqueness of our proposed method. It appears new works published still primarily take a 2D approach to either density- [51,52] or parenchymal pattern-based segmentations [33,37], though our method takes advantage of the third dimension. Other 3D approaches using mammography exist and also become more common, but are often proprietary [19,53] or may require in-image phantoms [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, with the emergence and growth of digital mammography technology in parallel with spread of computerized algorithms for image interpretation and diagnosis [29], interest in measuring breast density in a fully automatic, quantitative, as well as volumetric manner has grown [18,[30][31][32][33]. Noticeably, due to the rise in information processing power and growing amounts of data being created, machine learning algorithms have also seen an increased presence in such computer-aided analyses in breast imaging and radiology as a whole [33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdel-Nasser et al [44] used a local directional pattern for breast masses classification. Authors have used a mini-MIAS database for experiment, and comparing different size ( 32×32,64×64,75×75 and 150×150 pixels) ROI and finally classify mammogram masses using support vector machine.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histogram of Gradients (HOG) (Ergin & Kilinc, 2015), Local Configure Pattern (LCP) (Ergin & Kilinc, 2015), Uniform Directional Pattern (UDP) (Abdel-Nasser et al, 2015), Local Ternary Pattern (LTP) (Muramatsu et al, 2016), Local Phase Quantization (LPQ) (Ojansivu & Heikkilä, 2008) and Local Binary Pattern (LBP) (Oliver et al, 2007) are some such examples. There are three different variants of LBP, which are usually used for exploiting local textural properties; Uniform Local Binary Pattern (LBP-u), Rotation Invariant Local Binary Pattern (LBP-ri) and Rotation Invariant Uniform Local Binary Pattern (LBP-riu) (Nanni et al, 2012;Ojala et al, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%