Analysis of Video Image Based Element for Motion Sickness

Lee, Jaephil; Lim, Seonyoung; Ahn, Jeonghyon; Yi, Yuan Fu; Kim, Hyung Seok

doi:10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2018.03.ervr-470

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this experiment, we observed that different variations of PF resulted in similar levels of user performance and immersion. BM and SM presented virtually no difference except in the oculomotor component of SS, which was also statistically insignificant, suggesting that our results are not the fruit of the FOV, unlike the work of [30] that used some kind of visual technique to hide only the outer region without a 2D effect.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 57%

“…From the results, it seems that it can be advantageous to keep some level of the 3D view besides the PF view when using a controller because it might aid in the Dizziness factor. If the oculomotor strain is the most significant concern, opting for the darker outer layer can be of more considerable aid, similar to [30].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Their results would imply that trying to go for the highest possible realism might not be an effective way to prevent SS. Because the actual mechanisms for SS might be different from those of motion sickness, an earlier study found it hard to correlate motion sickness with SS [30].…”

Section: Simulator Sicknessmentioning

confidence: 94%

See 2 more Smart Citations

An In-Depth Exploration of the Effect of 2D/3D Views and Controller Types on First Person Shooter Games in Virtual Reality

Monteiro

Liang

Wang

et al. 2020

2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The amount of interest in Virtual Reality (VR) research has significantly increased over the past few years, both in academia and industry. The release of commercial VR Head-Mounted Displays (HMDs) has been a major contributing factor. However, there is still much to be learned, especially how views and input techniques, as well as their interaction, affect the VR experience. There is little work done on First-Person Shooter (FPS) games in VR, and those few studies have focused on a single aspect of VR FPS. They either focused on the view, e.g., comparing VR to a typical 2D display or on the controller types. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies investigating variations of 2D/3D views in HMDs, controller types, and their interactions. As such, it is challenging to distinguish findings related to the controller type from those related to the view. If a study does not control for the input method and finds that 2D displays lead to higher performance than VR, we cannot generalize the results because of the confounding variables. To understand their interaction, we propose to analyze in more depth, whether it is the view (2D vs. 3D) or the way it is controlled that gives the platforms their respective advantages. To study the effects of the 2D/3D views, we created a 2D visual technique, PlaneFrame, that was applied inside the VR headset. Our results show that the controller type can have a significant positive impact on performance, immersion, and simulator sickness when associated with a 2D view. They further our understanding of the interactions that controllers and views have and demonstrate that comparisons are highly dependent on how both factors go together. Further, through a series of three experiments, we developed a technique that can lead to a substantial performance, a good level of immersion, and can minimize the level of simulator sickness.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 57%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%