2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis on the effectiveness of indicators for evaluating urban carrying capacity: A popularity-suitability perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some situations, the larger the value of some indexes, the worse the effectiveness is [ 53 ]. Moreover, the closer some indexes are to the middle range, the better the effectiveness is and the more they are above or below the middle range, the worse the effectiveness is [ 54 ].…”
Section: An Improved Effectiveness Evaluation Methods Based On Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some situations, the larger the value of some indexes, the worse the effectiveness is [ 53 ]. Moreover, the closer some indexes are to the middle range, the better the effectiveness is and the more they are above or below the middle range, the worse the effectiveness is [ 54 ].…”
Section: An Improved Effectiveness Evaluation Methods Based On Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is imperative that the identified indicators must comprehensively measure the progress towards identified goals of sustainability of the transport systems (Litman, 2007;Marsden & Snell, 2009). The selected indicators must be in compliance with the internationally recognized criteria of comprehensiveness, clarity, policy relevance and informative accessibility for smart and sustainable mobility operations (Liu et al, 2020). They must be primarily consistent in addressing the issues raised in the selected domain of sustainability in the transport sector (Litman, 2013).…”
Section: Selection and Variability Of The Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CSI index was used to measure the sustainable tourismization level in China (Table 3). We considered index systems and indicators used in previous research, such as tourismization indicators [11,15,53,56], tourism sustainability indicators [60][61][62][63], and sustainable urban development indicators [64,65]. A total of 17 representative indicators were selected, including socio-cultural, economic, environmental indicators and tourism-related indicators.…”
Section: Comprehensive Evaluation Index System Of Sustainable Tourismizationmentioning
confidence: 99%