2022
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2021.3124708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Models of the Performance of IEEE 802.11p Vehicle to Vehicle Communications

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stability of the distributed platoon control under heterogeneous message rates is an open question that is not addressed in the literature and needs further research. State-of-the-art methods for channel estimation often rely on traffic information from I2V (Infrastructure-to-Vehicle) [7], [53]. Both through using Eq.…”
Section: E Message-rate Congestion Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of the distributed platoon control under heterogeneous message rates is an open question that is not addressed in the literature and needs further research. State-of-the-art methods for channel estimation often rely on traffic information from I2V (Infrastructure-to-Vehicle) [7], [53]. Both through using Eq.…”
Section: E Message-rate Congestion Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of seamlessly connecting vehicles, IEEE 802.11p-based wireless communication technologies have been developed, called dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) in the US and ITS-G5 in the European Union (EU) [ 6 , 7 ]. As one option, the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) has completed the first version of the Long-Term Evolution Vehicle-to-Everything (LTE-V2X) technology in the 4G-LTE network and has been investigating new use cases and technology requirements in 5G, 6G, and 6G-and-beyond networks [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSRC/ITS-G5 or LTE/5G V2X technologies bring forth vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I), infrastructure-to-vehicle (I2V), vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), and V2X communications, which are predominant building blocks for future ITS applications [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Observing the specific dynamics of vehicular mobility, along with the local scope targeted by DSRC, ITS-G5, LTE/5G V2X, and the AI-empowered intelligent reflecting surface (IRS) communication framework [ 11 ] for ITS applications, notable protocol stacks have been developed by IEEE Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE), ISO Communications Access for Land Mobiles (CALM), and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) [ 5 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common approach is therefore to use PER vs. SINR curves as already discussed. A few examples of works where these kinds of curves are used are [ 10 , 11 ], where LTE-V2X is studied, or [ 12 ], where the subject is IEEE 802.11p. Many research activities have therefore been devoted in the last decade to assessing the performance of direct V2X communications standards and providing PER vs. SINR as an output of their work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%