2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical procedures for short chain chlorinated paraffins determination - How to make them greener?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Due to the compositional complexity and the lack of single standards of CPs, as well as the fact that the instrument response of CPs depends on both the chlorination content and CP concentration, in previous works concerning the determination of CPs in environmental or biological samples, the quantification process was mostly developed by the single point quantitative method based on chlorine content. 21,34,35 ∑SCCPs and ∑MCCPs were determined and calculated in these studies and contents of CP homologues were subsequently calculated by their relative response factors. However, in the sampling rate calibration method of in vivo SPME, it is not feasible to calculate R s values of ∑SCCPs and ∑MCCPs for CP quantification in living organisms.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Due to the compositional complexity and the lack of single standards of CPs, as well as the fact that the instrument response of CPs depends on both the chlorination content and CP concentration, in previous works concerning the determination of CPs in environmental or biological samples, the quantification process was mostly developed by the single point quantitative method based on chlorine content. 21,34,35 ∑SCCPs and ∑MCCPs were determined and calculated in these studies and contents of CP homologues were subsequently calculated by their relative response factors. However, in the sampling rate calibration method of in vivo SPME, it is not feasible to calculate R s values of ∑SCCPs and ∑MCCPs for CP quantification in living organisms.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a number of studies conducted on landfills in China have focused on SCCP concentration that are determined in soil and sediment samples of e-waste dismantling areas than in landfill leachate and sediment samples. Different research studies have shown that concentrations of SCCPs in e-waste dismantling areas are significantly higher than in other sampling areas (Kalinowska et al 2019). Yuan et al (2017a) determined the highest concentrations of SCCPs in soils of an e-waste dismantling area, and ∑SCCP concentration ranged from 30.4 to 530 ng g −1 dw.…”
Section: Consumer Productsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Concentrations of SCCPs in soil samples were higher than in sediment samples, which were attributed to the distance between sampling points around the e-waste dismantling centres. Concentrations of SCCPs in soil and sediment samples may vary based on factors such as land-use type, proximity to sources and soil profile (Kalinowska et al 2019).…”
Section: Consumer Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared to conventional heating methods, Sajid et al [68] stated that using comparatively greener energy sources such as microwave and ultrasound for extraction can reduce the impact on the environment and the analyst. Kalinowaski et al [69] proposed a solution based on the green analytical chemistry principle: large volumes of analytical waste should be avoided, and proper management of analytical waste should be pro-vided, which includes optimising extraction and clean-up stages using mathematical and statistical modelling.…”
Section: Suspension Polymerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%