2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the compliance and correlation of LEED and BREEAM by conducting a criteria-based comparative analysis and evaluating dual-certified projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
31
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, six systems were identified from the analysis of the 52 green building rating systems (GBRSs) recognized by the World Green Building Council (Figure 1a; [61]); on the other hand, a systematic review was carried out in which five systems were identified from the analysis of 226 articles published in journals indexed in Scopus (Figure 1b). The rating systems' definition process shows the significance of LEED and BREEAM as the most recognized schemes in the academic sector ( Figure 1), which is in accordance with what has been shown by various studies [26,32,62,63]. Likewise, researchers show a clear lack of interest in the SHRSs developed by the MICs, given that just 7.5% of the studies analyzed in the systematic review only considered the GBI rating system [37,60,64,65].…”
Section: Definition Of the Rating Systemssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, six systems were identified from the analysis of the 52 green building rating systems (GBRSs) recognized by the World Green Building Council (Figure 1a; [61]); on the other hand, a systematic review was carried out in which five systems were identified from the analysis of 226 articles published in journals indexed in Scopus (Figure 1b). The rating systems' definition process shows the significance of LEED and BREEAM as the most recognized schemes in the academic sector ( Figure 1), which is in accordance with what has been shown by various studies [26,32,62,63]. Likewise, researchers show a clear lack of interest in the SHRSs developed by the MICs, given that just 7.5% of the studies analyzed in the systematic review only considered the GBI rating system [37,60,64,65].…”
Section: Definition Of the Rating Systemssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The relevance of the study of the indicators recognized by rating systems is that these systems, among the plethora of existing instruments used to evaluate building sustainability, have become commonly used in the building industry [24][25][26][27][28]. The flexible framework of these methods makes them receptive to covering more sustainability aspects [29], connecting the neighborhood and community, and thus contextualizing them on a broader scale [30].…”
Section: Background and Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The score assigned to each item was established based on information from existing sources (LEED ® [36][37][38][39][40][41], CONAVI [42], Martija Martínez [43], Rodriguez [44], Masera [45], MESMIS [46][47][48]) and by consensus of several collegiate works. Sustainability indicators are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Using the score obtained from the evaluation of each prototype, a ratio was made in the percentage of sustainability, thus obtaining a comparable figure.…”
Section: First Stage Construction Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) ir amerikiečių LEED (angl. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) (Suzer, 2019;Turk, Quintana ir Zhang, 2018;Heincke ir Olsson, 2012). Remiantis Lietuvos žaliųjų pastatų tarybos duomenimis (Lietuvos žaliųjų pastatų taryba, 2019), populiariausia mūsų šalyje sertifikavimo sistema yra BREEAM -iš viso sertifikuoti 49 pastatai.…”
Section: įVadasunclassified