2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13198-016-0443-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the factors affecting the flexibility in FMS using weighted interpretive structural modeling (WISM) approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It represents complex system in a visual hierarchical structure (Chang et al 2013;Borade and Bansod 2012) and transforms unclear, poorly articulated mental models of a system into visible, well defined hierarchical models (Alawamleh and Popplewell 2011;Jain and Raj 2015;Sindhwani and Malhotra 2016). ISM is primarily as a group learning process as interrelations among variables under study are decided based on group judgement (Gothwal and Raj 2015), but individuals may also apply it (Ravi and Shankar 2005;Faisal et al 2007). ISM has been applied to establish relationship among barriers in different fields (Table 2).…”
Section: More Reliance On Imported Devices Leading To Increased Importsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It represents complex system in a visual hierarchical structure (Chang et al 2013;Borade and Bansod 2012) and transforms unclear, poorly articulated mental models of a system into visible, well defined hierarchical models (Alawamleh and Popplewell 2011;Jain and Raj 2015;Sindhwani and Malhotra 2016). ISM is primarily as a group learning process as interrelations among variables under study are decided based on group judgement (Gothwal and Raj 2015), but individuals may also apply it (Ravi and Shankar 2005;Faisal et al 2007). ISM has been applied to establish relationship among barriers in different fields (Table 2).…”
Section: More Reliance On Imported Devices Leading To Increased Importsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of methodologies available for identification of determinants, for example; literature review (Avinash et al 2018 ; Dhochak and Sharma 2016 ; Gothwal and Raj 2017 ; Li et al 2019a , b ; Thamsatitdej et al 2017 ; Valmohammadi and Dashti 2016 ), expert opinion: (Cai and Xia 2018; Majumdar and Sinha 2019 ; Talib et al 2011 ; Hussain et al 2022 ; Ke et al 2022 ; Begum et al 2022 ; Thamsatitdej et al 2017 ; Vinodh et al 2016 ), case study: (Valmohammadi and Dashti 2016 ), Delphi method: (Zhang and Wei 2010 ), exploratory determinants analysis: (Usman et al 2021 ; Li and Yang 2014 ), presumed by authors (Lohaus and Habermann 2019 ), and idea engineering workshop and brainstorming session (Kumar et al 2013 ) are considered. The review of literature coupled with expert opinion is found to be the most appropriate method of determinants’ identification for the purpose of this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A statistical approach, such as structural equation modeling (SEM), could be linked to the ISM to reduce bias. In this case, a weighted ISM model could be applied to rank the factors under consideration on the basis of a Likert scale (Gothwal & Raj, 2017). The ISM model could also be extended using the total interpretive structural modeling approach (Shibin, Gunasekaran, & Dubey, 2017;Shibin et al, 2016) as it captures the nodes and links of the ISM.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%