Analyzing the root of regional innovation performance in the European territory

Abstract

Purpose Regional innovation performance is an important indicator for decision-making regarding the implementation of policies intended for regional development. However, regional development policies have led economies to very different competitive positions in matters of innovation. To address these issues, this paper aims to identify the variables that most contribute to the positioning of economies in terms of performance innovation in Europe. Design/methodology/approach The data for this study were collected at the regional innovation scoreboard. This paper uses a quantitative methodology through a multivariate statistical technique (discriminant analysis). Findings The results suggest that specific innovation strategies explain the competitive positioning of economies within each group of countries. It was possible to demonstrate that economies with leader classification show greater comparative robustness in the variables “Small and medium enterprise (SMEs) with product or process innovations,” “SMEs with product or process innovations,” “research and development (R&D) expenditure public sector” and “population with tertiary education,” constituting an effective instrument of innovation policy. Furthermore, it was possible to show that the economies belonging to the modest group do not have a competitive advantage in any of the variables under study, thus providing a reflection opportunity for policymakers at this level. Originality/value The present research identifies which variables are most relevant to the classification considering the regional innovation performance in leader, strong, moderate and modest. Several suggestions were given to companies, policymakers and higher education institutions in the sense that the regions where they operate can improve their innovative performance, which may help to a change in their current classification.

The Role of Open Innovation, and the Performance of European Union Regions

“…At the end of the first period with the RIS3 policies (2014-2020), the member states readjusted the RIS3 for the new period of 2021-2027. In this new period, EU policies aim to create conditions for sustainable, inclusive, and smart growth [32][33][34].…”

Research and innovation challenges for better policies in food systems and bioeconomy transitions – evidence from Poland

“…Based on the results obtained, EU countries are divided into four groups, depending on the value of the synthetic indicator: Innovation leaders, Strong innovators, Moderate innovators, Emerging innovators. Sweden remains the EU innovation leader, followed by Finland, Denmark and Belgium, all with innovation scores well above the EU average (Lopes et al, 2021).…”

The role of university Knowledge Transfer Offices: Not just commercialize research outputs!

“…Entre otros factores críticos que afectan el desempeño en las IES se encuentra el liderazgo, mejoramiento continuo, prevención, medición de recursos, mejora de procesos, satisfacción del cliente interno, satisfacción del cliente externo, gestión de colaboradores y trabajo en equipo (Kanji et al, 1999). Además, las IES deben considerar el desempeño financiero que puede verse afectado por factores como calidad del servicio, gastos generales, demanda de productos y servicios, etapas del ciclo de vida del producto, productividad y satisfacción de stakeholders; lo que a su vez impacta en el desempeño y desarrollo de las comunidades y naciones en la zona de influencia directa de operaciones (Lopes et al, 2021).…”