2016
DOI: 10.17085/apm.2016.11.3.260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaphylactic shock caused by an intradermal skin test-negative antibiotic during general anesthesia -A case report-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since there are various medications and many supplies that come in contact with one another from the induction of anesthesia to the operation, it is difficult to distinguish the cause from the anesthetized patient because you cannot know exactly when the symptoms began. 12 The first symptom found in this case was a shock which started with tachycardia and hypotension, and the dermatological symptoms were not recognized because of the surgical drapes and abnormal respiratory symptoms were not observed. Therefore, we believe these non-specific symp-toms were not diagnosed early as anaphylaxis, but they were misdiagnosed and treated as LAST.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, since there are various medications and many supplies that come in contact with one another from the induction of anesthesia to the operation, it is difficult to distinguish the cause from the anesthetized patient because you cannot know exactly when the symptoms began. 12 The first symptom found in this case was a shock which started with tachycardia and hypotension, and the dermatological symptoms were not recognized because of the surgical drapes and abnormal respiratory symptoms were not observed. Therefore, we believe these non-specific symp-toms were not diagnosed early as anaphylaxis, but they were misdiagnosed and treated as LAST.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, because of the low sensitivity and low positive predictive value of cephalosporin antibiotics, even if the skin test is negative, the risk of anaphylaxis cannot be completely ruled out. 1,12,20 Along with the symptoms, laboratory tests help formulate the diagnosis, and when there is an anaphylactic event, immediate examinations of serum tryptase, plasma histamine, and 24-hour urinary histamine metabolites are known to be useful.1 Among these, elevated levels of serum tryptase are the most useful biomarker to determine Ig-E-mediated hypersensitivity, reaching the maximum elevated level around 15-60 mi-nutes after anaphylaxis and lasting for 4 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kas gevşeticiler için deri testlerinin tahmini duyarlılığı yaklaşık %94-97'dir, ancak barbitüratlar, opioidler ve benzodiazepinler için duyarlılığı zayıftır. Lateks duyarlılığı da deri testleri ile araştırılmalıdır (37) . Ancak ülkemizde yapılan bir çalışmada, lateks spesifik IgE ile belirlenen %6.6 duyarlılığa rağmen, ameliyat sırasında herhangi bir allerjik reaksiyon olmadığı için rutin preoperatif lateks allerjisi testlerinin gerekli olmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır (38) .…”
Section: Kimler Risk Altındadır?unclassified