2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2010.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomic differences after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and open prostatectomy: implications for radiation field design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So'nggi yillarda prostata saratoni uchun robotik radikal prostatektomiya (RRRP) amaliyoti dunyo bo'ylab eng mashhur bo'ldi. Shunday qilib, Li 2007-yilda Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlarida radikal prostatektomiya umumiy sonining 60% robototexnika yordamida amalga oshirilganligini va bu turdagi operatsiyalar soni yildan yilga ortib borayotganini ma'lum qildi [1]. Akademik sohada ham, xususiy sektorda ham robot yordamida prostatektomiyani afzal ko'radigan urologlar soni yildan yilga ortib bormoqda.…”
Section: Kirishunclassified
“…So'nggi yillarda prostata saratoni uchun robotik radikal prostatektomiya (RRRP) amaliyoti dunyo bo'ylab eng mashhur bo'ldi. Shunday qilib, Li 2007-yilda Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlarida radikal prostatektomiya umumiy sonining 60% robototexnika yordamida amalga oshirilganligini va bu turdagi operatsiyalar soni yildan yilga ortib borayotganini ma'lum qildi [1]. Akademik sohada ham, xususiy sektorda ham robot yordamida prostatektomiyani afzal ko'radigan urologlar soni yildan yilga ortib bormoqda.…”
Section: Kirishunclassified
“…The pelvic anatomy after robotic-assisted RP has been shown to be considerably different from that after open prostatectomy, with the size of the trigonal musculature defect being more pronounced, total urethral length statistically longer, and larger separation for the vesicorectal distance after robotic-assisted RP. 44 …”
Section: Post-prostatectomy Clinical Target Volumementioning
confidence: 99%