Realizing the Full Potential of Social Safety Nets in Africa 2018
DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1164-7_ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anchoring in Strong Institutions to Expand and Sustain Social Safety Nets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results have implications regarding social protection policies. First, our results suggest that it would be useful to continue enhancing the capacity of institutions and public authorities, as they are the backbone of the delivery of social protection programmes (Coll‐Black, Monchuk and Standford, 2018). This should not only be limited to the provision of technical support, for example to administrators who are expected to execute the social protection policies and to initiate reforms, but also to improve on existing legal frameworks, accountability, transparency, effectiveness, efficiency, coordination, equity, inclusiveness, participation and consensus at central and decentralized level (Vinci and Roelen, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These results have implications regarding social protection policies. First, our results suggest that it would be useful to continue enhancing the capacity of institutions and public authorities, as they are the backbone of the delivery of social protection programmes (Coll‐Black, Monchuk and Standford, 2018). This should not only be limited to the provision of technical support, for example to administrators who are expected to execute the social protection policies and to initiate reforms, but also to improve on existing legal frameworks, accountability, transparency, effectiveness, efficiency, coordination, equity, inclusiveness, participation and consensus at central and decentralized level (Vinci and Roelen, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…First, we understand the institutions that support social protection programmes to refer to the organizations influencing the design, implementation and management of these interventions (Coll‐Black, Monchuk and Standford, ). In this article, the terms “quality of institutions” or “performance of institutions” are used to capture organizations’ functioning and effectiveness (Rueschemeyer and Evans, ).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaboration between service providers, such as DAs, HEWs, SWs and the kebele manager (KM), is crucial for the delivery of the PSNP. These “local frontline workers” are responsible to oversee, coordinate, manage and deliver social protection interventions (Coll‐Black, Monchuk and Standford, , p. 184). Therefore, they can affect the overall implementation of the social protection intervention.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "institutions" is sometimes used interchangeably with the term "organisations" (Abah, 2012) and scholars have viewed the organisations, their structures and procedures, as institutions which are responsible to exercise the governance over economic activities (Williamson, 1975(Williamson, , 1985. Institutions and organisations provide public services and support social protection programmes, influencing the design, the implementation and the management of these interventions (Coll-Black, Monchuk, & Standford, 2018) both at central and decentralized level. It is also important to highlight that the level of decentralisation of a country may affect how institutions exercise their governance.…”
Section: The Role Of Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%