2007
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aneuploidy and Confined Chromosomal Mosaicism in the Developing Human Brain

Abstract: BackgroundUnderstanding the mechanisms underlying generation of neuronal variability and complexity remains the central challenge for neuroscience. Structural variation in the neuronal genome is likely to be one important mechanism for neuronal diversity and brain diseases. Large-scale genomic variations due to loss or gain of whole chromosomes (aneuploidy) have been described in cells of the normal and diseased human brain, which are generated from neural stem cells during intrauterine period of life. However… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
216
2
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
17
216
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is in agreement with a recent single-neuron sequencing study that, despite identifying a high frequency of subchromosome copy number variants, did not observe high levels of whole-chromosome aneuploidy in neurons (30). Prior reports used SKY and FISH to assess the prevalence of aneuploidy and found it to exceed 50% and 20% in the liver and brain, respectively (13,14,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). We attribute this difference to drawbacks associated with using FISH to detect somatic aneuploidy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This observation is in agreement with a recent single-neuron sequencing study that, despite identifying a high frequency of subchromosome copy number variants, did not observe high levels of whole-chromosome aneuploidy in neurons (30). Prior reports used SKY and FISH to assess the prevalence of aneuploidy and found it to exceed 50% and 20% in the liver and brain, respectively (13,14,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). We attribute this difference to drawbacks associated with using FISH to detect somatic aneuploidy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We conclude that the prevalence of aneuploidy in the adult human brain is 2.2% (95% CI 0.3%-7.9%; Fig. 2B and Table S1), significantly less than the more than 20% aneuploidy reported by prior studies (16)(17)(18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Application of nextgeneration sequencing methods will allow for an easier and more sensitive calling of the smallest mosaic aberrations in the near future and will add up to the (scarce) data generated recently on this topic by some other groups. [30][31][32][33] Various causes could account for the discrepancy in CNV findings between our congenital anomaly twin cohort and the Parkinson's cohort. First of all, an age factor: the rather high prevalence of mosaic CNVs in PD twins could have been generated during lifetime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…La distinction entre ces deux types de mutations est ainsi fondée sur des inférences non véri-fiables, étant donné qu'il s'agissait là de cancers déjà développés. Il est alors pertinent de signaler ici que des mutations somatiques (silencieuses) ont été identifiées dans les cellules des tissus normaux [17,18]. Les données les plus frappantes, qui réfutent probablement définitivement la théorie des mutations somatiques, viennent de la publication d'une étude récente qui n'a identifié aucune mutation somatique dans un certain type de tumeurs humaines, les épendymomes [19].…”
Section: Les Causes Du Cancer Et Les Explications Avancéesunclassified