1993
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(93)91065-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angioscopic evaluation of periprocedural and postprocedural abrupt closure after percutaneous coronary angioplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, coronary angioscopy is superior to angiography for detecting intracoronary RT, it is relatively difficult to distinguish WT from adjacent white tissue elements by angioscopy [25][26][27][28][29]. However, angioscopy is not being used currently in the U.S.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, coronary angioscopy is superior to angiography for detecting intracoronary RT, it is relatively difficult to distinguish WT from adjacent white tissue elements by angioscopy [25][26][27][28][29]. However, angioscopy is not being used currently in the U.S.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can only speculate about the pathogenesis of acute re-occlusion in this setting. Typical post-PTCA acute occlusion is thought to result from intimal dissection, spasm, and thrombosis [8]. In the setting of the postexercise recovery period, coronary spasm and hyperaggregable platelets through exercise-mediated catecholamine release may be responsible [5].…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%