2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11886-022-01658-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AngioVac for Minimally Invasive Removal of Intravascular and Intracardiac Masses: a Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AngioVac was approved by FDA in 2009 for the removal of unwanted material from the vascular system and has been used as early as 2011 in the removal of complex masses from the right atrium [33]. In a meta-analysis of the AngioVac catheter device system use in caval thromboemboli, right-sided cardiac masses, catheter-related thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism, the success rate was 73.6%, with reported access site complications including bleeding, hematoma, and distal embolization [34]. Rajput et al reported 16 patients who had intracardiac masses aspirated using the AngioVac device catheter system; none had access site complications and all were successfully closed using Perclose device [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AngioVac was approved by FDA in 2009 for the removal of unwanted material from the vascular system and has been used as early as 2011 in the removal of complex masses from the right atrium [33]. In a meta-analysis of the AngioVac catheter device system use in caval thromboemboli, right-sided cardiac masses, catheter-related thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism, the success rate was 73.6%, with reported access site complications including bleeding, hematoma, and distal embolization [34]. Rajput et al reported 16 patients who had intracardiac masses aspirated using the AngioVac device catheter system; none had access site complications and all were successfully closed using Perclose device [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percutaneous aspiration of vegetations from the tricuspid valve has been reported with increasing frequency in the last decade [162,163]. This procedure is performed by placing the patient on an extracorporeal circulatory circuit through large bore venous drainage and venous return cannulas.…”
Section: Percutaneous Aspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other indications which have been described include debridement of right-sided endocarditis, reduction in thrombus burden in a pulmonary embolus, and utilization for capturing particulate matter in cases where embolic material may be a threat (i.e. indwelling catheter or device-related thrombus or vegetation) [ 6 ]. In this approach, an aspiration cannula is inserted into one of the major veins and connected to a veno-venous bypass circuit which then captures the aspirated debris.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, an aspiration cannula is inserted into one of the major veins and connected to a veno-venous bypass circuit which then captures the aspirated debris. Although there have been case series that focus on the reduction in thrombus burden and hospital survival, data are lacking on the impact of these devices long-term on survival and patient outcomes [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%