1996
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.96104s2193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal behavioral methods in neurotoxicity assessment: SGOMSEC joint report.

Abstract: Images Figure 2.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the observed change in behavior, we further examined the Tg mice by subjecting them to a test that measures response to being placed in a novel environment. The test consists of placing mice in a chamber that allows the monitoring of both horizontal and vertical motions (Kulig et al, 1996). The results were tabulated and compared with those from sex-and age-paired controls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the observed change in behavior, we further examined the Tg mice by subjecting them to a test that measures response to being placed in a novel environment. The test consists of placing mice in a chamber that allows the monitoring of both horizontal and vertical motions (Kulig et al, 1996). The results were tabulated and compared with those from sex-and age-paired controls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motion in horizontal and vertical directions was assessed as described by Kulig et al (1996), in a test chamber with a 4 x 4 array of 11 x 11-cm square grids painted on the floor and wooden sides extending 50 cm above the floor. Horizontal movement was defined as entry into a square with all four limbs and vertical activity as movements in which the forelimbs and body were elevated off the floor or in contact with the side walls.…”
Section: Behavioral Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last week of treatment, animals were subjected to neurological examination according to Kulig et al for assessment of sensory reactivity, grip strength and motor activity. 28…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 12th week of treatment, all animals were examined for assessment of sensory reactivity, assessment of grip strength and motor activity. These included the functional observational battery [8] . Individual animal body weights were recorded prior to commencement of treatment (day of grouping—day 0), weekly thereafter during the treatment and recovery periods, and at necropsy (overnight fasted body weights).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%