2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal Experimental Study to Test Application of Intelligent Pressure Control Device in Monitoring and Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure During Flexible Ureteroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) has been applied in recent years to the treatment of urinary stones, which presents overt advantages over other techniques, including improved resolution and increased optical field, high stone-free rate, reduced risk of bleeding, limited surgical injury, good repeatability, and speedy recovery; in addition, further miniaturization is possible. [10][11][12] In children and infants, who have a relatively high stone recurrence rate, 13 flexible ureteroscopy could be performed repeatedly. FURS and holmium laser lithotripsy in treating infants and children has been previously assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) has been applied in recent years to the treatment of urinary stones, which presents overt advantages over other techniques, including improved resolution and increased optical field, high stone-free rate, reduced risk of bleeding, limited surgical injury, good repeatability, and speedy recovery; in addition, further miniaturization is possible. [10][11][12] In children and infants, who have a relatively high stone recurrence rate, 13 flexible ureteroscopy could be performed repeatedly. FURS and holmium laser lithotripsy in treating infants and children has been previously assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perfusion pressure chosen to keep constant in this study was 1.96Kpa (20cmH2O), which was slightly higher than that of human renal pelvis pressure 0.98kpa (10cmH2O). However, under this perfusion pressure, the urodynamic parameters of the upper urinary tract did not change abnormally, indicating that this pressure was within the safe pressure range of renal pelvic perfusion and was significantly lower than the clinically accepted safety pressure of renal pelvis perfusion during percutaneous nephroscopic surgery (30mmHg) [11]. Second, because the experimental site is located in Kunming (latitude 25 °02: 11\ "north, longitude 102 °42: 31\" east, the average altitude is about 1891 m), the background altitude is high and the atmospheric pressure is low, so the standard pressure reference value of 1.96Kpa is adopted.…”
Section: Analysis Of Urodynamic Parameters Of Upper Urinary Tract In mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The perfusion pressure chosen to remain constant in this study was 1.96 kPa (20 cmH 2 O), which was slightly higher than the human renal pelvis pressure of 0.98 kPa (10 cmH 2 O). However, under this perfusion pressure, the urodynamic parameters of the upper urinary tract did not change abnormally, indicating that this pressure was within the safe pressure range of renal pelvic perfusion and was significantly lower than the clinically accepted safe pressure of renal pelvis perfusion during percutaneous nephroscopic surgery (30 mmHg) [ 11 ]. Second, because the experimental site is located in Kunming (latitude 25°02: 11\"north, longitude 102°42: 31\"east, average altitude of approximately 1891 m), the background altitude is high and the atmospheric pressure is low, so the standard pressure reference value of 1.96 kPa was adopted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%