2017
DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2017.1356742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal suffering as a challenge to theistic theodicy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated above, this limited scope of classical theodicies has been responded to by the development of new accounts that explicitly claim to include animals (e.g., Murray 2008;Moritz 2014;Aguti 2017;Dougherty 2014;Crummett 2017). There are a number of suggestions as to why, from a theistic perspective, an eschatological perspective including animals (or at least more complex types of animals) should be welcomed (e.g., section III in Hereth and Timpe 2020).…”
Section: Animal Suffering and Theismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated above, this limited scope of classical theodicies has been responded to by the development of new accounts that explicitly claim to include animals (e.g., Murray 2008;Moritz 2014;Aguti 2017;Dougherty 2014;Crummett 2017). There are a number of suggestions as to why, from a theistic perspective, an eschatological perspective including animals (or at least more complex types of animals) should be welcomed (e.g., section III in Hereth and Timpe 2020).…”
Section: Animal Suffering and Theismmentioning
confidence: 99%