2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14246300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic Weighted Total Variation Feature Fusion Network for Remote Sensing Image Denoising

Abstract: Remote sensing images are widely applied in instance segmentation and objetive recognition; however, they often suffer from noise, influencing the performance of subsequent applications. Previous image denoising works have only obtained restored images without preserving detailed texture. To address this issue, we proposed a novel model for remote sensing image denoising, called the anisotropic weighted total variation feature fusion network (AWTVF2Net), consisting of four novel modules (WTV-Net, SOSB, AuEncod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 3f, 4f and 5f present the denoising effects of the proposed improved TSETMF algorithm on the three images, respectively. It should be noted that the PDBTMF algorithm removes noise by comparing the numerical relationships between the current pixel and the neighboring pixels [64]. The MDBMF algorithm is a non-linear salt and pepper filter able to maintain the signal edges [65].…”
Section: Contrastive Denoising With 95% High-density Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 3f, 4f and 5f present the denoising effects of the proposed improved TSETMF algorithm on the three images, respectively. It should be noted that the PDBTMF algorithm removes noise by comparing the numerical relationships between the current pixel and the neighboring pixels [64]. The MDBMF algorithm is a non-linear salt and pepper filter able to maintain the signal edges [65].…”
Section: Contrastive Denoising With 95% High-density Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the cross-media distorted image restoration experiments, in order to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm in conventional scenarios, the algorithm of this paper is compared with the more advanced methods proposed by the existing AWTVFFNet [40], UnfairGAN [41], LPF [42], and CARNet [43]. The mean square error, peak signal-to-noise ratio, structural similarity, and time for image restoration of this paper's algorithm and the compared algorithms are shown in Figure 8.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%