2003
DOI: 10.2982/0012-8317(2003)92[11:acotff]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annotated Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Kenya (excluding the lacustrine haplochromines from Lake Victoria)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
99
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"Turkwell" and 'Enteromius' spec. "Baringo", in the Kerio and Turkwell basins (Seegers et al 2003). In this basin-wide analysis, the Omo River still retains a greater richness at 63 (79.75%) fish species while Lake Turkana harbors only 55 (69.62%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…"Turkwell" and 'Enteromius' spec. "Baringo", in the Kerio and Turkwell basins (Seegers et al 2003). In this basin-wide analysis, the Omo River still retains a greater richness at 63 (79.75%) fish species while Lake Turkana harbors only 55 (69.62%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Fish specimens were fixed in 10% formalin. Identification was made to species level following relevant literature (e.g., Boulenger 1909Boulenger , 1911Boulenger , 1915Boulenger , 1916Tedla 1973;Hopson & Hopson 1982;Seegers et al 2003;Habteselassie 2012). Voucher specimens were deposited in the Zoological Natural History Museum (ZNHM) of Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia (Table 2).…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed several records of mollies are known to derive from misidentified specimens, such as the Vouliagmeni sailfin molly which was originally identified as Poecilia sphenops (see Chintiroglou et al 1996). Another possible misidentification concerns a Poecilia species in Kenya which has been assigned to P. latipinna and as such it is included in FishBase and other global databases of invasive alien species (Seegers et al 2003). We suspect that there are further citations of the latter species that represent cases of misidentifications, while on the other hand, we cannot not exclude the possibility that it reflects undetected occurrences due to incorrect identifications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%