Annotation and Provenance Tracking in Semantic Web Photo Libraries

Halaschek-Wiener, Christian; Golbeck, Jennifer; Schain, Andrew; Grove, Michael; Parsia, Bijan; Hendler, James A.

doi:10.1007/11890850_10

Cited by 31 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Halaschek-Wiener et al [209] present a Semantic Web portal to annotate digital images and track their provenance, in the form of annotations such as submitter name and email. Provenance is browsable and actively used to enrich the user's browsing experience.…”

Section: Semantic Web Techniques For Provenancementioning

confidence: 99%

The Foundations for Provenance on the Web

Moreau

2010

FNT in Web Science

172

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Provenance, i.e., the origin or source of something, is becoming an important concern, since it offers the means to verify data products, to infer their quality, to analyse the processes that led to them, and to decide whether they can be trusted. For instance, provenance enables the reproducibility of scientific results; provenance is necessary to track attribution and credit in curated databases; and, it is essential for reasoners to make trust judgements about the information they use over the Semantic Web.As the Web allows information sharing, discovery, aggregation, filtering and flow in an unprecedented manner, it also becomes very difficult to identify, reliably, the original source that produced an information item on the Web. Since the emerging use of provenance in niche applications is undoubtedly demonstrating the benefits of provenance, we contend that provenance can and should reliably be tracked and exploited on the Web, and we survey the necessary foundations to achieve such a vision.Using multiple data sources, we have compiled the largest bibliographical database on provenance so far. This large corpus allows us to analyse emerging trends in the research community. Specifically, using the CiteSpace tool, we identify clusters of papers that constitute research fronts, from which we derive characteristics that we use to structure our foundational framework for provenance on the Web. We note that such an endeavour requires a multi-disciplinary approach, since it requires contributions from many computer science sub-disciplines, but also other non-technical fields given the human challenge that is anticipated.To develop our vision, it is necessary to provide a definition of provenance that applies to the Web context. Our conceptual definition of provenance is expressed in terms of processes, and is shown to generalise various definitions of provenance commonly encountered. Furthermore, by bringing realistic distributed systems assumptions, we refine our definition as a query over assertions made by processes.Given that the majority of work on provenance has been undertaken by the database, workflow and e-science communities, we review some of their work, contrasting approaches, and focusing on important topics we believe to be crucial for bringing provenance to the Web, such as abstraction, collections, storage, queries, workflow evolution, semantics and activities involving human interactions.However, provenance approaches developed in the context of databases and workflows essentially deal with closed systems. By that, we mean that workflow or database management systems are in full control of the data they manage, and track their provenance within their own scope, but not beyond. In the context of the Web, a broader approach is required by which chunks of provenance representation can be brought together to describe the provenance of information flowing across multiple systems. This is the specific purpose of the Open Provenance Vision, which is an approach that consists of controlled voc...

show abstract

Section: Semantic Web Techniques For Provenancementioning

confidence: 99%

The Foundations for Provenance on the Web

Moreau

2010

FNT in Web Science

172

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[14]. For professional content found in archives and digital libraries, a range of in-house or standardized multimedia formats is used.…”

Section: A Catalogue Of Multimedia Ontologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This ontology is used within the SemanticMM4U Component Framework 14 for the multi-channel generation of semantically-rich multimedia presentations.…”

Section: M3o: Multimedia Metadata Ontologymentioning

confidence: 99%

The landscape of multimedia ontologies in the last decade

Suárez-Figueroa

Atemezing

Corcho

2011

Multimed Tools Appl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many efforts have been made in the area of multimedia to bridge the socalled "semantic-gap" with the implementation of ontologies from 2001 to the present. In this paper, we provide a comparative study of the most well-known ontologies related to multimedia aspects. This comparative study has been done based on a framework proposed in this paper and called FRAMECOMMON. This framework takes into account process-oriented dimension, such as the methodological one, and outcome-oriented dimensions, like multimedia aspects, understandability, and evaluation criteria. Finally, we derive some conclusions concerning this one decade state-of-art in multimedia ontologies.

show abstract

“…PhotoStuff [5] is a tool that allows users to highlight regions within images, create instances from any ontology through sophisticated forms and link the instance to the region of the image. The users are able to perform the semantic annotation locally and then upload the RDF instance to a central database, where the RDF file -and therefore the whole graph including multiple instance statements -is then attributed to the user through his/her user account and time stamped for provenance data.…”

Section: Semantic Annotation Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Semantic Web: Research and Applications

Franconi¹,

Kifer²,

May³

2007

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Annotea provides an annotation protocol to support collaborative Semantic Web-based annotation of digital resources accessible through the Web. It provides a model whereby a user may attach supplementary information to a resource or part of a resource in the form of: either a simple textual comment; a hyperlink to another web page; a local file; or a semantic tag extracted from a formal ontology and controlled vocabulary. Hence, annotations can be used to attach subjective notes, comments, rankings, queries or tags to enable semantic reasoning across web resources. More recently tabbed Browsers and specific annotation tools, allow users to view several resources (e.g., images, video, audio, text, HTML, PDF) simultaneously in order to carry out side-by-side comparisons. In such scenarios, users frequently want to be able to create and annotate a link or relationship between two or more objects or between segments within those objects. For example, a user might want to create a link between a scene in an original film and the corresponding scene in a remake and attach an annotation to that link. Based on past experiences gained from implementing Annotea within different communities in order to enable knowledge capture, this paper describes and compares alternative ways in which the Annotea Schema may be extended for the purpose of annotating links between multiple resources (or segments of resources). It concludes by identifying and recommending an optimum approach which will enhance the power, flexibility and applicability of Annotea in many domains.

show abstract

Annotation and Provenance Tracking in Semantic Web Photo Libraries

Cited by 31 publications

References 7 publications

The Foundations for Provenance on the Web

The Foundations for Provenance on the Web

The landscape of multimedia ontologies in the last decade

The Semantic Web: Research and Applications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About