2017
DOI: 10.1080/01430750.2017.1378720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annual performance analysis of a single-basin passive solar still coupled with evacuated tubes: comprehensive study in climate conditions of Mahesana, Gujarat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the cost per liter/m 2 from the PSSG1 was calculated as: 50.30/6165 = USD 0.0082. Furthermore, it was also observed that the cost per liter/m 2 of PSSG1 in this study was much lower (i.e., USD 0.0082) than other solar stills reported by previous studies in Pakistan [98], India [56,79,[99][100][101][102][103], Malaysia [50,82], Egypt [95,97,[104][105][106][107], Canada [52], Saudi Arabia [108], Iran [109][110][111][112][113] which reportedly costed at the rates of USD 0.063, 0.2, 0.024, 0.0264, 0.026, 0.86, 0.026, 0.054, 0.105, 0.015, 0.065, 0.049, 0.08, 0.048, 0.06, 0.14, 0.18, 0.039, 0.13, 0.023, 0.019, 0.105 and 0.1652, respectively.…”
Section: Cost Study and Analysis Of The Produced Water By Pssg1supporting
confidence: 46%
“…Therefore, the cost per liter/m 2 from the PSSG1 was calculated as: 50.30/6165 = USD 0.0082. Furthermore, it was also observed that the cost per liter/m 2 of PSSG1 in this study was much lower (i.e., USD 0.0082) than other solar stills reported by previous studies in Pakistan [98], India [56,79,[99][100][101][102][103], Malaysia [50,82], Egypt [95,97,[104][105][106][107], Canada [52], Saudi Arabia [108], Iran [109][110][111][112][113] which reportedly costed at the rates of USD 0.063, 0.2, 0.024, 0.0264, 0.026, 0.86, 0.026, 0.054, 0.105, 0.015, 0.065, 0.049, 0.08, 0.048, 0.06, 0.14, 0.18, 0.039, 0.13, 0.023, 0.019, 0.105 and 0.1652, respectively.…”
Section: Cost Study and Analysis Of The Produced Water By Pssg1supporting
confidence: 46%
“…This indicates that the use of a vacuum tube solar collector has a considerable beneficial influence on the distillation process, resulting in much increased distillate production. 29 Sharma et al 30 conducted both theoretical and practical evaluations on a basic solar still linked to N-identical ETC stacked in series. The EPBT for the system was calculated to be about 1.72 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared to a regular solar still, the modified solar still demonstrated a stunning 97.6% increase in production. This indicates that the use of a vacuum tube solar collector has a considerable beneficial influence on the distillation process, resulting in much increased distillate production 29 . Sharma et al 30 conducted both theoretical and practical evaluations on a basic solar still linked to N‐identical ETC stacked in series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of transparent walls increased the effective available area for condensation by 78.4%. Panchal et al (2019) investigated the performance of a solar still assisted with a heat pipe. From one year comparative study it was found that still with heat pipes have 97.6% improvement in yield compared with conventional still.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%