2013
DOI: 10.1177/1545968313491006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Transiently Improves Contrast Sensitivity and Normalizes Visual Cortex Activation in Individuals With Amblyopia

Abstract: These preliminary results suggest that a-tDCS deserves further investigation as a potential tool to enhance amblyopia treatment outcomes in adults.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
76
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The stimulation parameters (current intensity and duration) were chosen in accordance with the safety criteria, for preventing any side-effects caused by cortical excitability modulation (Nitsche et al, , 2008Poreisz, Boros, Antal, & Paulus, 2007), and were commonly used in previous experiments for exploring visual cortex functions (e.g., Antal et al, 2004;Spiegel, Byblow, Hess, & Thompson, 2013;Spiegel, Hansen, Byblow, & Thompson, 2012;Vigan o et al, 2013). The stimulation intensity and duration were at the upper ends of tDCS protocols in order to ensure, as much as possible, that effects of tDCS would not be offset by the effects of presenting the potent gratings themselves.…”
Section: Tdcs Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimulation parameters (current intensity and duration) were chosen in accordance with the safety criteria, for preventing any side-effects caused by cortical excitability modulation (Nitsche et al, , 2008Poreisz, Boros, Antal, & Paulus, 2007), and were commonly used in previous experiments for exploring visual cortex functions (e.g., Antal et al, 2004;Spiegel, Byblow, Hess, & Thompson, 2013;Spiegel, Hansen, Byblow, & Thompson, 2012;Vigan o et al, 2013). The stimulation intensity and duration were at the upper ends of tDCS protocols in order to ensure, as much as possible, that effects of tDCS would not be offset by the effects of presenting the potent gratings themselves.…”
Section: Tdcs Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to the development of amblyopia treatment interventions designed to reduce suppressive mechanisms within the human visual cortex [11,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. One approach, based on psychophysical models of binocular vision and supported by initial clinical studies in adults [11,23,27] and children [22] involves dichoptic (separate images to each eye) presentation of high contrast images to the amblyopic eye and lower contrast images to the fellow eye.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques for the treatment of amblyopia is developing rapidly [25,26,32], and tDCS is particularly attractive owing to its low cost and the possibility that it can be used in the patient's own home [33]. Anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) tends to increase and cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) tends to decrease excitability in the stimulated region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some improvement in contrast sensitivity with the sole use of brain stimulation, so far, has been observed in individuals with amblyopia after the administration of either anodal tDCS (Spiegel, Byblow, Hess, & Thompson, 2013) or high-frequency repetitive TMS (Clavagnier, Thompson, & Hess, 2013;Thompson, Mansouri, Koski, & Hess, 2008). Although here, improvement on CS is much more limited (to a single spatial frequency) than when combined with PL, suggesting a weaker effect of tRNS in the absence of a behavioural task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%