2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2018.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropometric mismatch between furniture height and anthropometric measurement: A case study of Korean primary schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shoulder Height (SH): The vertical distance measured from the horizontal sitting surface to the top of the shoulder at the acromion with the arms hanging without restraint and the shoulders relaxed, in the sitting position with the back and legs angles 90˙ [ 3 , 5 , 12 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Shoulder Height (SH): The vertical distance measured from the horizontal sitting surface to the top of the shoulder at the acromion with the arms hanging without restraint and the shoulders relaxed, in the sitting position with the back and legs angles 90˙ [ 3 , 5 , 12 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knee Height (KH): The vertical distance from the foot resting surface to the top of the knee cap [ 62 ]. The KH is measured just above the patella at a knee flexion angle of 90˙ [ 3 , 10 , 12 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study used Excel 2016 and SPSS25.0 to analyze the data. In addition, the greedy algorithm approach, which was utilized by Lee and Kim [45] to find the optimal height system for the chairs and desks of Korean students, was applied to derive the optimal specifications for the target design variables, and R programming was used to implement the greedy algorithm to calculate the optimal specifications of the console. The greedy algorithm approach is simple and primitive as it finds the maximum match rate of a specification by substituting the anthropometric dimension of each user in the mismatch equation and incrementing it by 1 mm sequentially for all possible specifications.…”
Section: Data Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%