2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial characteristics in Cu-containing Zr-based thin film metallic glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
26
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 shows the survival rate for the same samples after 1, 2, 3 and 4 h of contact time. The calculation has been done using the equation reported by Chu et al [23] but expressed as the survival rate: Survival rate=1CFUS.SteelCFUSampleCFUS.Steel , where CFU S.Steel and CFU Sample are the recovered E. Coli colony-forming units from stainless steel and the sample, respectively. The percentage of bacteria eliminated after 1 h corresponds to 58% of the bacteria recovered from the stainless steel coupons and the values for CH 2 mm and NCH 3 mm samples are similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 shows the survival rate for the same samples after 1, 2, 3 and 4 h of contact time. The calculation has been done using the equation reported by Chu et al [23] but expressed as the survival rate: Survival rate=1CFUS.SteelCFUSampleCFUS.Steel , where CFU S.Steel and CFU Sample are the recovered E. Coli colony-forming units from stainless steel and the sample, respectively. The percentage of bacteria eliminated after 1 h corresponds to 58% of the bacteria recovered from the stainless steel coupons and the values for CH 2 mm and NCH 3 mm samples are similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Chu et al [17] proposed the use of the Japanese Industrial Standard JIS Z2801:2000 to assess the antimicrobial properties of Zr-Cu-based thin films. The value of the antimicrobial activity proposed by this standard is calculated through the formula R = log ( B / A ) where R is the antimicrobial activity, A is the average number of viable cells of bacteria after 24 h inoculation of the treated test piece and B is the average of the number of viable cells of bacteria on the untreated test piece after 24 h. Nevertheless, the authors decided to calculate the antimicrobial rate as NoNN×100% where N 0 and N are the number of viable microbes on a control sample and on the prepared thin film respectively [17]. The same equation was used by Sharifahmadian et al to compare the antimicrobial rate of wire arc spray copper coatings with that of commercial copper and stainless steel [18].…”
Section: Standards For Antimicrobial Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors such as Chu et al [17] used the plate count method where the number of bacterial colonies that grew on each agar plate is counted and compared to the control. Other methods are viz.…”
Section: Factors Responsible For Antimicrobial Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although some authors have previously studied the antimicrobial behaviour of Cucontaining metallic glasses [10,21] the possibility of tuning the antimicrobial performance by controlling the formation of crystalline phase has been mostly overlooked.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%