Authorshe cost of overactive bladder (OAB) is a significant financial burden on patients, families, and the health care system. In 2000, the total economic cost of OAB in the United States was estimated at $18.2 billion, which is more than either osteoporosis or Parkinson' s disease. OAB costs at the community level were approximately $13.8 billion, while costs at institutions were $4.4 billion.1 A study examining insurance claims showed that total annual claims among OAB patients was $5,018 versus $1,767 among non-OAB controls (1995 dollars).
2Drug Treatment for OAB Head-to-head studies comparing 2 immediate-release forms of antimuscarinic drug therapy, oxybutynin, and tolterodine, have shown that they have similar efficacy; however, tolterodine has an improved side-effect profile, most notably less dry mouth, and is associated with fewer treatment withdrawals as a result of drug-related adverse events.
3-7The side effects from OAB drug therapy have resulted in poor compliance and, subsequently, low persistence with therapy over time. 4,8,9 Persistence with drug therapy is important for achieving long-term treatment benefits. In a number of retrospective claims studies, patients receiving tolterodine have been shown to remain on therapy longer than those receiving oxybutynin. 6,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] There is also evidence that suggests that OAB patients who are able to continue with medication have greater symptom improvement and use fewer resources.
16Phase III clinical trials of controlled-release oxybutynin have indicated better patient compliance, reduced side effects, and equivalent efficacy as compared to oxybutynin IR. [17][18][19] Both extended-release tolterodine and controlled-release oxybutynin have been shown to be more effective and better tolerated than immediate-release tolterodine. 20,21 These data further suggest that extended-release tolterodine has better tolerability and fewer side effects than controlled-release oxybutynin. Although there are no head-to-head studies to suggest that one of the extended-release drugs is more efficacious than the other, one recent study compared extended-release tolterodine to controlled-release oxybutynin using a 4-way crossover design in a small number of patients. 22 Using change in bladder capacity as a surrogate for efficacy, a 6 mg dose of extended-release tolterodine was found to be equivalent to a 20 mg dose of oxybutynin. However, the 6 mg dose of extended-release tolterodine produced a side-effect profile with respect to dry mouth similar to the 10 mg dose of controlled-release oxybutynin. This implies that extended-release tolterodine might be as efficacious as oxybutynin but has an improved tolerability profile.
T
A B S T R A C TOBJECTIVE: To compare the estimated first-line treatment costs of extended-release tolterodine versus controlled-release oxybutynin in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).METHODS: We developed a decision-analysis model to estimate the patterns of treatment, resource consumption, and cost impact of treating OAB with...