2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91548-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aortic valve function post-replacement of severe aortic stenosis by transcatheter procedure versus surgery: a systematic review and metanalysis

Abstract: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has shown to reduce mortality compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR). However, it is unknown which procedure is associated with better post-procedural valvular function. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that compared TAVR to sAVR for at least 2 years. The primary outcome was post-procedural patient-prosthesis-mismatch (PPM). Secondary outcomes were post-procedural and 2-year: effective orifice area (EOA), paravalvular gradien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, studies proved the superiority of TAVR in high-risk patients (17), non-inferior in intermediate-risk (18), and superior in low-risk patients (19). We recently showed that most post-procedural aortic valve function parameters assessed by echocardiography also favor TAVR (20). With newer studies proving not only safety but also the superiority of TAVR as an alternative to sAVR among patients with diverse surgical risk profiles (17)(18)(19), the proportion of TAVR procedures relative to sAVR procedures conducted annually is on the rise, as seen in our study in both diabetes and non-diabetes patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, studies proved the superiority of TAVR in high-risk patients (17), non-inferior in intermediate-risk (18), and superior in low-risk patients (19). We recently showed that most post-procedural aortic valve function parameters assessed by echocardiography also favor TAVR (20). With newer studies proving not only safety but also the superiority of TAVR as an alternative to sAVR among patients with diverse surgical risk profiles (17)(18)(19), the proportion of TAVR procedures relative to sAVR procedures conducted annually is on the rise, as seen in our study in both diabetes and non-diabetes patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both valve replacement procedures give rise to the most common problem—prosthetic mismatch—which can lead to bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, diminished regression of the left ventricular mass, symptoms recurrence, and unfavorable clinical outcomes [ 21 ]. Therefore, it is crucial to find treatment alternatives to alleviate aortic valve stenosis due to various risk factors and complications.…”
Section: Clinical Risk Factors and Treatment Of Cavsmentioning
confidence: 99%