2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.10.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aortic Valve Translocation for Severe Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Early Results and Long-Term Follow-Up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we also introduced the supraannular AVR using the Solo Smart valve for patients with active IE with extensive annular defect as a simple and technically less demanding alternative to ARR 4,5 or aortic valve translocation technique. 1,3 According to the literature and our experience, patients with severe annular destruction did not always require ARR because the infection did not always extend to the sinus of Valsalva or the coronary ostium. 7 In other words, the sinus of Valsalva wall tends to remain intact even in extensive annular destruction.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we also introduced the supraannular AVR using the Solo Smart valve for patients with active IE with extensive annular defect as a simple and technically less demanding alternative to ARR 4,5 or aortic valve translocation technique. 1,3 According to the literature and our experience, patients with severe annular destruction did not always require ARR because the infection did not always extend to the sinus of Valsalva or the coronary ostium. 7 In other words, the sinus of Valsalva wall tends to remain intact even in extensive annular destruction.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…| 899 because of late coronary artery bypass graft stenosis and aneurysmal dilatation of aortic root, it is now an alternative to ARR using homografts with technical modification 3. However, ARR and aortic valve translocation technique are challenging and technically demanding in this setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nottin and colleagues showed that it was a reliable alternative to a homograft. Actuarial survival rates at 10 and 15 years were 38% and 35%, respectively …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…23,24 It is well known that both homografts and autografts offer excellent hemodynamic performance, and it is thought that they are resistant to infection. Indeed, the reported incidences of recurrent PVE after aortic root replacement using homografts or autografts range from 0% to 4.2% and 0% to 4%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%