2020
DOI: 10.19180/1809-2667.v22n12020p59-81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aplicação do processo de avaliação de risco em atividades de colheita florestal semimecanizada e mecanizada

Abstract: Na colheita florestal,  independente  do grau de mecanização, o trabalho humano estará sempre presente, o que exige um planejamento para diminuir os índices de acidentes do trabalho. Nesse contexto essa pesquisa aplicou a metodologia denominada de Processo de Avaliação de Risco em Colheita Florestal (PARCF) para identificar, analisar e avaliar os riscos ocupacionais que se originam na atividade de colheita florestal semimecanizada e mecanizada, de forma a contribuir para o planejamento e implantação de um sist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different approaches and methods are applied in the particular context of forestry activities. The most widely used are the AHP-analytic hierarchy process [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], the MMR-method of the magnitude of risk [22] and the PARCF-process of risk assessment in forest harvesting [23]. However, these methods are not specific to managing activities in native rainforests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches and methods are applied in the particular context of forestry activities. The most widely used are the AHP-analytic hierarchy process [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], the MMR-method of the magnitude of risk [22] and the PARCF-process of risk assessment in forest harvesting [23]. However, these methods are not specific to managing activities in native rainforests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most published studies do not reflect concerns about the risk assessment methods' validation or their reproducibility and reliability [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%