2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2021.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of SCoT markers for detection of variations in Fusarium yellows resistant lines of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) induced through gamma irradiations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PIC corresponds to its ability to detect polymorphisms among the individuals in a population [23]. The maximum PIC value for dominant markers is 0.5 [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Our results from the dominant SCoT markers showed a mean PIC = 0.3.…”
Section: Efficiency Of Scot and Indel Markers For Genetic Diversity A...mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The PIC corresponds to its ability to detect polymorphisms among the individuals in a population [23]. The maximum PIC value for dominant markers is 0.5 [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Our results from the dominant SCoT markers showed a mean PIC = 0.3.…”
Section: Efficiency Of Scot and Indel Markers For Genetic Diversity A...mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The results of Catharanthus roseus L. seed irradiated with gamma rays induced significant variations through the appearance of polymorphic and unique bands in most treatments of both cultivars (El-Shaer and Ibrahim, 2021). The past results also established the marker's ability to reveal variations induced by gamma rays in ginger (Sharma and Thakur, 2021), Atropa belladonna (El-Shaer and Ibrahim, 2021), grape (Yue et al, 2019), and tomato (El-Fiki et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Polymorphism information content (PIC) corresponds to its ability to detect the polymorphism among individuals of a population [ 26 , 27 ]. The PIC maximal value for dominant markers is 0.5 [ 26 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]; that is what we obtain as output from the online tool [ 35 ]. On the other hand, some studies reported a PIC value for dominant markers higher than 0.5 [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%