Applicability of two commonly used bone age assessment methods to twenty-first century UK children

Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess the effect of secular change on skeletal maturation and thus on the applicability of the Greulich and Pyle (G&P) and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW3) methods.MethodsBoneXpert was used to assess bone age from 392 hand trauma radiographs (206 males, 257 left). The paired sample t test was performed to assess the difference between mean bone age (BA) and mean chronological age (CA). ANOVA was used to assess the differences between groups based on socioeconomic status (taken from the Index of Multiple Deprivation).ResultsCA ranged from 2 to 15 years for females and 2.5 to 15 years for males. Numbers of children living in low, average and high socioeconomic areas were 216 (55%), 74 (19%) and 102 (26%) respectively. We found no statistically significant difference between BA and CA when using G&P. However, using TW3, CA was underestimated in females beyond the age of 3 years, with significant differences between BA and CA (− 0.43 years, SD 1.05, p = < 0.001) but not in males (0.01 years, SD 0.97, p = 0.76). Of the difference in females, 17.8% was accounted for by socioeconomic status.ConclusionNo significant difference exists between BoneXpert-derived BA and CA when using the G&P atlas in our study population. There was a statistically significant underestimation of BoneXpert-derived BA compared with CA in females when using TW3, particularly in those from low and average socioeconomic backgrounds. Secular change has not led to significant advancement in skeletal maturation within our study population.Key Points • The Greulich and Pyle method can be applied to the present-day United Kingdom (UK) population. • The Tanner and Whitehouse (TW3) method consistently underestimates the age of twenty-first century UK females by an average of 5 months. • Secular change has not advanced skeletal maturity of present-day UK children compared with those of the mid-twentieth century. Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06300-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Determination of bone age and evaluating the applicability of Greulich-Pyle standards among the Turkish children

“…Van Rijn et al [15] examined the Dutch children's BA and found the GP method usable for BA determination. Al Shamrani et al [17] evaluated the radiographs of 392 patients taken due to trauma in United Kingdom. They observed that there was no significant difference between BA and CA when the GP atlas was used.…”

How does artificial intelligence in radiology improve efficiency and health outcomes?

“…By reading the exam concurrently with the radiologist or as a second read, bounding boxes, markers and probability scores aid the radiologist in the diagnostic process. Many products are on the market and much research has been conducted to demonstrate the performance of these algorithms in comparison to radiologists or a ground truth (level 2) [13,[34][35][36]. However, most of these products cannot be used as a standalone medical device, and it is therefore the accuracy of the combination of the software and radiologist that matters (level 3).…”

Zur Altersdiagnostik lebender Personen: der Einfluss des sozioökonomischen Status auf die Skelett- und Zahnentwicklung in einer deutschen Studienkohorte

“…Für Länder mit hohem Einkommen liegen aktuelle Daten von Alshamrani und Offiah (2020) vor [33]. Die Autoren untersuchten 2 unterschiedliche Stadiensysteme für die Handskelettentwicklung an einer englischen Population unterschiedlicher Ethnien im Alter von 2 bis 15 Jahren in der Region Sheffield.…”

“…Alshamrani und Offiah konnten nur für eine der beiden untersuchten Methoden einen Zusammenhang zwischen Skelettalter und SES feststellen. Für die Methode, welche insgesamt besser mit dem chronologischen Alter der Teilnehmer korrelierte, konnte kein Zusammenhang festgestellt werden [33]. Diese Ergebnisse können -ebenso wie die Resultate der gegenständlichen Studie -als Indiz dafür gewertet werden, dass in Ländern mit geringerem sozialen Gefälle kein offensichtlicher Zusammenhang zwischen SES und Skelettalter festzustellen ist.…”